Anointed One
Gone Country!
Bradford already has an ankle injury in OTA lol.
Doesn't surprise me... I was not/am not sold on him being a starting G in the NFL...
Bradford already has an ankle injury in OTA lol.
Nwosu is practicing without any limitation so that's a positive in OTAs.
I was really excited to see Nwosu play last year. I thought he was going to have a break out season but he started off slow and never got the chance to turn it on. I feel he will start slow this year ( Because of the injury ) but by week 10 should be a menace in our defense. There is just something about him where i feel he has not even tapped into his full potential yet. Macdonald should be able to bring the best out of him.
I also feel our offense will struggle mightily again because one thing Grubb isn't really good at is devising a run game. People like to boast about his "run game" like it was great but it was always a afterthought in his offense. This team needs a STRONG run game with out a doubt and they have the RB room to be exceptional in that area but is Grubb capable of bringing that out? I don't feel he is.
They should have went with a offensive genious but they went with a passing OC who has a afterthought Running game. Like Grubb for sure because he was a Huskie coach but I am not blinded by that fact. he wasn't very good and scheming up a top flight running game, or even a middle of the pack one.
I'm interested to see how Grubb utilizes Walker, Charbonnet and sometimes McIntosh. Also interested in seeing how Huff coaches up the Oline. Hoping those 2 having familiarity with each other helps the transition to the pros. A lot of unknowns with these first time coaches so might be a bit of growing pains but looking forward to the fresh approach.I don't watch a ton of College football so I can't comment for sure, but here's a good article that somewhat mentions that the running game is not just an afterthought. I think having Penix and the best WR group in NCAAF also negated a bit of the need to run, but he still said it is needed to set it up.
Seahawks Analysis: Breaking Down Run Game Concepts in Ryan Grubb's Offense
Calling plays in the NFL for the first time, what will Ryan Grubb's offense look like with the Seattle Seahawks from a run game standpoint?www.si.com
As the article mentions, he employed a lot of zone running throughout his career which does work great in the NFL and Walker is a great zone runningback. Seattle's running plays last year started to get SUPER vanilla (maybe due to OL injuries?) and they just started jamming Walker up the middle while trying to strongarm opposing DLs... Walker still found a way to make reads but what Waldron was drafting up with the run game was pathetic.
I'm torn on that one. DK is uniquely talented, but I don't think we have been getting it all out of him. Some of that is on him, some on the organization. Most of the time throwing huge $ at a WR is not the way to go, but it could be palatable to give him a 3rd contract in Seattle if we're not also paying big bucks to a QB at that time. Even if we strike gold with Howell, he probably won't be counting all that much against the cap for another 3 or 4 years. And if it's not him, it'll probably be someone else drafted in the next couple years. Either way, QB salary should be low enough to keep DK around if that's what we want to do.I'll be interested to see what we do with Metcalf this year... he'd probably ask for a new contract in 2025 especially if he balls out this year...
Speaking of huge money... J. Jefferson just signed a 4 yr/140 million dollar deal... 110 guaranteed...I'm torn on that one. DK is uniquely talented, but I don't think we have been getting it all out of him. Some of that is on him, some on the organization. Most of the time throwing huge $ at a WR is not the way to go, but it could be palatable to give him a 3rd contract in Seattle if we're not also paying big bucks to a QB at that time. Even if we strike gold with Howell, he probably won't be counting all that much against the cap for another 3 or 4 years. And if it's not him, it'll probably be someone else drafted in the next couple years. Either way, QB salary should be low enough to keep DK around if that's what we want to do.
I hate dumping big money on WRs tbh. I can kind of see it with a Jefferson or Lamb going into their prime but there are only a very few that are worth the big hit, imo. The QBs and OCs make the receiver, not the other way around. As athletically gifted as DK is, he has done very little to warrant a big payday or increase. There are so many good WRs coming out of college now that what teams are paying these guys is pretty stupid. Miami and Philly both paying 2 guys big money. We did it with the last extension to DK and paying Lockett as well and I wasn't really happy about that, even though I like those guys.I'm torn on that one. DK is uniquely talented, but I don't think we have been getting it all out of him. Some of that is on him, some on the organization. Most of the time throwing huge $ at a WR is not the way to go, but it could be palatable to give him a 3rd contract in Seattle if we're not also paying big bucks to a QB at that time. Even if we strike gold with Howell, he probably won't be counting all that much against the cap for another 3 or 4 years. And if it's not him, it'll probably be someone else drafted in the next couple years. Either way, QB salary should be low enough to keep DK around if that's what we want to do.
I hate dumping big money on WRs tbh. I can kind of see it with a Jefferson or Lamb going into their prime but there are only a very few that are worth the big hit, imo. The QBs and OCs make the receiver, not the other way around. As athletically gifted as DK is, he has done very little to warrant a big payday or increase. There are so many good WRs coming out of college now that what teams are paying these guys is pretty stupid. Miami and Philly both paying 2 guys big money. We did it with the last extension to DK and paying Lockett as well and I wasn't really happy about that, even though I like those guys.
Jefferson will be on a long list of players to make a shitload of money and have a great career but won't even sniff a championship. His talent was wasted with Cousins anyway. Not sure how McCarthy will turn out but I also have somewhat low expectations. Not going Ponder level bust though. I think the kid will be okay, just nothing special.Yah fair... Jefferson makes sense because you have Christian Ponder 2.0 at QB. He'll need all the help he can get.
Jefferson will be on a long list of players to make a shitload of money and have a great career but won't even sniff a championship. His talent was wasted with Cousins anyway. Not sure how McCarthy will turn out but I also have somewhat low expectations. Not going Ponder level bust though. I think the kid will be okay, just nothing special.
Some times i dont get the hate some of you have for Cousins. In the past 5 years Rogers Mahomes and COUSINS have been the best QB's in the NFL. I get it, you all think he is crap just like you all thought Purdy and Goff were crap yet they are also in the top 5. Take the blinders off and give respect where it's due. These QB's have "EARNED" at least that much.
I have never understood the hate for Cousins.
View attachment 363994
He can be a little heavy on the fumbles (with turnovers) but he's certainly produced. Perhaps it's because he's never been great in the playoffs but in 2022 the Vikes D shit the bed against the Giants and in 2019 he had the 49ers D to deal with and his D didn't do much to help either.
Who here wouldn't take Cousins over Geno?One thing i have noticed is most of the time your QB isn't winning you Playoff games it's more often than not the defense unless you are named Rogers or Mahomes. Imagine Cousins on Baltimore, KC, Bills or Tampa a couple years ago when these teams had great defenses. I have zero doubt he would have a ring. I would 100% take Cousins over Geno.
Who here wouldn't take Cousins over Geno?
Well last season when i said I would 100% take Cousins over Geno i was flamed by MANY in here and NO ONE said they would also take Cousins. The only ones that said anything were the ones against Cousins.
I think Cousins is a fine QB, but would I want him over Geno at the moment given all factors? Ehh......
Things to consider:
1) Cousins is 36 (or will be in 2 months),
2) Coming off a major injury and has much more mileage on him than Geno.
3) His current cap hit is about $15M more than Geno this year which allowed us to build out this roster - that couldn't have happened otherwise.
4) Kirk is almost uncuttable next year... sure you can work salary cap magic, but his dead cap next year is almost $70M if I recall.
5) Geno can be cut next year for a minimal cap hit (only a measly $6.75M if spread over 2 years)
6) Geno actually got in the MVP voting in 2022, Kirk has never done that.
7) Geno was injured a couple games last year and playing injured with an abysmal OL, one of the worst defenses, and an offense that couldn't figure out how to use a route ninja in JSN and just kept running behind LOS plays...
That said, I don't know if I'd be willing to sacrifice all that for Kirk. If I could have Kirk on a 1 year rental and his health was guaranteed for $10M, then I don't think anyone would question taking him over Geno... who will be 34...
But there's a number of other factors. And maybe they think Howell can be an answer next year - who knows. I am still frustrated to see Howell still has that stupid ball pat before throwing. They really need to get him to stop that habit. It may not allow DBs/safeties enough time to react, but guarantee DL/EDGE are going to look for that 100% and get their hands up the minute they see it.
The question is, is he better? Not how much he costs. I just think it's funny how half or more than half the posters here bash him and yet he has been one of the better QB's in the NFL the past 5 years. He makes more because he earned it.