jstewismybastardson
Lord Shitlord aka El cibernauta
Clearly a solid reason to bite someone...
cause effect ... if the fingers arent in his mouth ... nothing is getting bitten
Clearly a solid reason to bite someone...
if someone puts their fingers in my mouth in hockey and doesnt move them I think I would clamp down as well. if you choose to sit there and suck on his glove sweat I guess thats your thing
I probably would move my head or his hand. It doesnt take a PHD to figure out how to remove a hand from ones mouth. Or to not let it in there to begin with...
I probably would move my head or his hand. It doesnt take a PHD to figure out how to remove a hand from ones mouth. Or to not let it in there to begin with...
cause effect ... if the fingers arent in his mouth ... nothing is getting bitten
when the linesman has a hold of your arm its kinda difficult
umm... don't think jstew is condoning biting here.
just pointing out that a precedent has been set that "regular season precedents are out the window in the later rounds of the playoffs"
- earlier rulings indicate that biting is a suspendable offense (ie. Ruutu got 2 games, so Burrows should get something)
is comparable to: - earlier rulings indicate spraying water at a fan is a suspendable offense (Tortoralla got 2 games, Horton should have gotten something)
nowhere in there does it equate squirting water versus biting someone.
the ONLY point is, earlier precedents do not carry forward deep into the playoffs.
Boston benefited once, now Vancouver has as well. that's it.
Wow so know you can control a players head through their arm...
umm... don't think jstew is condoning biting here.
just pointing out that a precedent has been set that "regular season precedents are out the window in the later rounds of the playoffs"
- earlier rulings indicate that biting is a suspendable offense (ie. Ruutu got 2 games, so Burrows should get something)
is comparable to: - earlier rulings indicate spraying water at a fan is a suspendable offense (Tortoralla got 2 games, Horton should have gotten something)
nowhere in there does it equate squirting water versus biting someone.
the ONLY point is, earlier precedents do not carry forward deep into the playoffs.
Boston benefited once, now Vancouver has as well. that's it.
lol
i guess burr was supposed to spit him out?
lol
i guess burr was supposed to spit him out?
or MOVE
I hope most of this is in jest, because I will never see the reasoning in a grown ass man biting someone.
I hope most of this is in jest, because I will never see the reasoning in a grown ass man biting someone.
i am in jest. I dont like that he did it. I dont like the way the nhl officiates. I dont like they way they review things. I dont like the toronto maple leafs but it is what it is in the NHL
I guess I see squirting water as something that is a ticky tack suspension while biting is an absolute.
I heard a rumor that there was no suspension for Burrows. Is this true?