- Thread starter
- #1
The Derski
No Fat Chicks
Suck. Plain and simple. I'm not taking away anything from the Patriots. It was an amazing comeback. But the OT rules should and probably will be changed soon.
So what?They were just changed like 6 years ago....
Irrelivent. OT rules suck. What happened in the 3rd quarter has nothing to do with the rules being stupid.The game wasn't lost by the coin toss
Game was lost because the Falcons D folded at the end of the game
Nothing wrong with OT rules
Instead of looking at OT rules maybe look at why a team loses a game after being up 28-3 in the 3rd quarter
too funnyIf you think the rules are perfectly fine right now you're a fool.
Wtf? I see a flaw and call it out. Do you not see the flaw?too funny
Let that be a packers win and your tune is much different
staff member?
more like troll with a badge
The fact that a scenario exists in which one of the teams will never possess the ball is ridiculous. The NFL MVP never stepped on the field in OT. How can people see nothing wrong with that?
nope...no flawWtf? I see a flaw and call it out. Do you not see the flaw?
Quit making personal attacks and discuss the actual rule.
and I see a football fan disagree with you and you call him a foolWtf? I see a flaw and call it out. Do you not see the flaw?
Exactly. Essentially a coin toss decided a super bowl. Had Atlanta won the toss and marched down the field I'd feel the same way. It is a flawed system.I'd be in favor of altering the rule for the Super Bowl so that each team gets a possession. You shouldn't give one team an advantage over the other in the Super Bowl OT simply because of a coin toss. It would give the fans more entertainment value, too. When the Pats won the coin toss, it was easy to see that their chance of ending the game with a TD were high because the Falcons were gassed and hadn't stopped them the last two drives.
Essentially a coin toss decided a super bowl.
Do you agree with a potential "5th quarter" for overtime? Why don't we do that before we proclaim sudden death?nope...no flaw
a team should be expected to stop a team once in awhile
FG woulda done it
AND the MVP calls time out cause he can't hear the play? LOL...why not be a leader and call 32 power?
fact remains...if that's Rodgers, you aren't saying jack shit
The fact that a scenario exists in which one of the teams will never possess the ball is ridiculous. The NFL MVP never stepped on the field in OT. How can people see nothing wrong with that?