Sportster 72
Well-Known Member
JD told JP Finlay he saw a blitz they weren't ready for on the funky miss to Terry. My bad, good play by Daniels.
My desire is to watch Washington but not to over spend to watch. Years ago when I was living in NY I paid for the Sunday ticket so I could watch Washington.
holy shit.
Try the vcee boxMy desire is to watch Washington but not to over spend to watch. Years ago when I was living in NY I paid for the Sunday ticket so I could watch Washington.
My plan this year is to watch Washington. I have yet to see a game on Peacock. I'll watch what is available but I am not going to give them more money. If that means missing some games then so be it.
NEWS FLASH;
They don't like it when the tail wags the dog.NEWS FLASH;
NFL players are becoming increasingly frustrated with NFL team owners who refuse to acknowledge how much players value maximizing their earning potential in careers that typically end in less than 4-5 years after their rookie contracts. (QBs excepted)
So, they have no sense of history? Free agency began in 1961, and the players, their representatives, and union have grown smarter as the years passed.They don't like it when the tail wags the dog.
Free agency definitely changed the game. Gibbs saw the writing on the wall and knew he was going to have to break the team up.So, they have no sense of history? Free agency began in 1961, and the players, their representatives, and union have grown smarter as the years passed.
For those of you who don't know or can't recall it.
It wasn't until R.C. Owens, a talented 49ers receiver who introduced the sports world to the term “alley-oop,” played out his option year in 1961 and became the NFL's first free agent.
Owners are their own worst enemies when it comes to paying too much for players. Especially since the NFLPA became smarter and got a lot deeper into owners pockets. Good for the players in this case.
I agree with most of your post, but players for years have signed backloaded contracts to help the team out and as soon as it's time to collect, that player gets cut.Owners are their own worst enemies when it comes to paying too much for players. Especially since the NFLPA became smarter and got a lot deeper into owners pockets. Good for the players in this case.
Players not honoring contracts is a problem and one I myself do not like. The games Aiyuk is playing are ridiculous. The idea that next man up should make more money than the previous guy is stupid. Many of these guys are not as guys who they insist on being paid more than.
If you get drafted you'll make at least 2-3 million dollars over that period depending on guarantees. How many other people make that kind of money?
It might sound like I am pro-owner and nothing could be more true. I coached for and against young men who went on to play at some level and I was always rooting for them. Their careers are often short.
At the same time some players are getting paid stupid money now. Now owners can afford to keep a few very high paid players and let others walk. Team building is harder than ever. JMO but there needs to be a middle ground. If Daniels is who we all hope and think he might be what is he worth in 5 years .... $70-$90 million a year?
I agree that a few years back when players were getting 6-7 year contracts but being cut after 3-4 years was tough. That was disingenuous. Some years back a young player I knew who played for SF received a big contract. I told him then ..... put some away, this is not always going to be there. A couple of years later he had a bad knee injury and was gone a couple of years after that.I agree with most of your post, but players for years have signed backloaded contracts to help the team out and as soon as it's time to collect, that player gets cut.
NFL is so dangerous and the life span is so short. Going out there on a one year deal is a gamble many aren't willing to take. I get that Kirk did it, but I don't fault players who don't.
To your point, what Trent is doing and what Hassan Reddick are doing is crazy.