Put Burrow on this team and Haskins with the Bengals and the results would have been reversed. The difference is in having an organization that knew what to do with young talent and one that still does not.The point is now of the guys you have wanted would have made this team any better. Some would make it worse. Mahomes is fantastic and on his own level. Nobody takes pay cuts like Tom Brady. Other than those two, Aaron Rodgers is next on the best list but he can’t get anything done because he isn’t as good as Mahomes and doesn’t take less pay like Brady.
Justin Herbert gets all the accolades but has not really proven to be elite. You want to take a shot when the shot simply has not been worth it. No QB in this draft is worth a trade up and probably not even worth the number one pick. I don’t see any of these guys changing an organization. ,
You claim KC can’t win a championship. I would say not a single QB in the last draft class or this draft class will. You don’t trade up to just get a QB and cross your fingers.
I don’t forget about RGME’s good year. He was electric. He lacked the illusiveness of Jackson, Hurts, and Wilson but his speed would cause LBs to creep up and he would hit over their head in front of the safeties. His legs made play-action deadly. Then he got selfish and thought he was something he wasnt, a good pocket passer.
The team went 6-3 the prior year with Alex Smith before Haskins came on board. It was essentially the same team but they added McLaurin and Guice. The next season they added Antonio Gibson and Logan Thomas. You can make excuses for Haskins but he was a failure and your excuses don’t hold up. Haskins showed no growth and couldn’t catch on elsewhere.
Interesting that you didn't respond to my question.
I will agree with you about excuses but not about facts!