SlinkyRedfoot
Well-Known Member
sure. i copied a section for you that you didnt read.
Martinez’s 1999 season may be the most dominant of all time. While his 2000 season had a higher ERA+ (291 vs 243) his 1999 season had a higher K/9, a lower HR/9, a lower FIP and a higher fWAR. (I like fWAR better for pitchers because it is based on FIP and not runs allowed.) And since Pedro pulled off the back-to-back-to back months of winning A.L. Pitcher of the Month in 1999, we’re going to use that as a comparison for what Sale is doing this season.
Pedro’s 1999 was just ridiculous. Over 213.1 IP, he managed a 2.07 ERA, a 1.39 FIP, with a 13.20 K/9 and a 1.56 BB/9.
Sale so far this season? A 2.04 ERA, 2.09 FIP, 13.21 K/9 and a 2.11 BB/9. While not quite matching Pedro’s 1999 season, it’s not a bad imitation. And his 216 OPS+ probably accurately captures the difference between their two years.
But the similarities don’t end there. Both HR/9’s are absurdly low with Pedro at 0.38 and Sale at 0.64. ERA- also looks a lot alike. Pedro was at 42 and Sale currently boasts a 47. ERA- is a park and league adjusted ERA metric similar to ERA+, only better than league average figures will be below 100 instead of above it. For context, anything lower than 70 is considered excellent.
they are
comparing
1999
vs
2018
So, an article that says Sale's 2018 isn't as good as Pedro's 1999 is supporting your position that Sale's 2017 is comparable to Pedro's 1999?
funny shit, dude.