rolltide14_0
~V--I--P~
It's kind of funny we're hearing some whining about Missouri and the SEC bias....
Back in 2007, still a Big 12 team, Missouri started the season unranked coming off an 8-5 year. After defeating Illinois, Ole Miss, Western Michigan, Illinois State, and Nebraska.....Missouri found themselves ranked #11 after 5 games.
Here we are a few years later, Missouri...now in the SEC, started the season unranked. After defeating Murray St., Toledo, Indiana, Arky St., Vanderbilt, UGA, and Florida.....Missouri finds themselves ranked #5 after 7 games.
Is there really THAT much of a difference here to say that SEC bias is at work for Mizzou? Was there Big 12 bias back then?
Back in 2007, still a Big 12 team, Missouri started the season unranked coming off an 8-5 year. After defeating Illinois, Ole Miss, Western Michigan, Illinois State, and Nebraska.....Missouri found themselves ranked #11 after 5 games.
Here we are a few years later, Missouri...now in the SEC, started the season unranked. After defeating Murray St., Toledo, Indiana, Arky St., Vanderbilt, UGA, and Florida.....Missouri finds themselves ranked #5 after 7 games.
Is there really THAT much of a difference here to say that SEC bias is at work for Mizzou? Was there Big 12 bias back then?