NBA OFF TOPIC THREAD

[DJ Fieri]

The Bengals cafeteria is not one I want to visit.

Just saying.

 

[Think McFly Think]

The Bengals cafeteria is not one I want to visit.

Just saying.

For real, you know football players got a big appetite, if they’re saying 4 outta 10 it’s gotta be bad.

 

[bksballer89]

 

[Shanemansj13]

A long talk. No way he wants to go to NY or Vegas

 

[thunderc]

A long talk. No way he wants to go to NY or Vegas

I’m sure he wants to get paid like that a couple more years though.

 

[bksballer89]

I’m sure he wants to get paid like that a couple more years though.

Plus he already got a ring so winning isn’t mandatory. Secure the bag

 

[dtgold88]

Interesting

Not sure where Saints pick but why so interesting? I mean, if fake drafters are right maybe he does slip.

 

[dtgold88]

Myles doubling down on wanting out and new deal wont change anything........not sure I buy it as if Browns hold firm doubt he retires.

 

[bksballer89]

Not sure where Saints pick but why so interesting? I mean, if fake drafters are right maybe he does slip.

He’s not slipping to 9

 

[dtgold88]

He’s not slipping to 9

I don't think he does but guys like Rodgers and Quinn were thought to be top 5 guys (or maybe even higher) and went much later so 9 doesn't seem crazy to at least talk to the guy even if no plans to trade up.

 

[shopson67]

If that's the structure, got to think the Rams match.

 

[The Q]

Nailed it......always cracks me up when someone calls a pick a reach and it's because guys who GUESS where players will be taken had them going later. Maybe, just maybe the mocker was wrong?

And, sure, none of this means a FO wont miss badly on a player as we know they do.

I'd bet if we could see all teams' draft boards they would look wildly different.

It’s not just about right and wrong


But efficient allocation of draft capital

To use a hyperbolic example

Even if you knew Brady was a stud, you’re better off waiting and landing him if you can

 

[dtgold88]

It’s not just about right and wrong


But efficient allocation of draft capital

To use a hyperbolic example

Even if you knew Brady was a stud, you’re better off waiting and landing him if you can

OK, but do you agree if you saw all 30 draft boards they'd look far different from each other?

As to Brady? If you knew what he'd become then, no, you don't wait as you cannot just assume no one else feels the same as you about him. Go back in time and redraft and those drafting know what we know now where are you thinking he is picked?