fightinfunbags
Well-Known Member
Go fuck yourselfGrow up.
Go fuck yourselfGrow up.
I don't think BM would handle it well at all if doesn't win the job.
And the Panthers haven't made any indications yet that BM is their starter that I'm aware of. Both QB's should be very motivated to get the job.
Does anyone know BM's timeline to full return from surgery? Not sure if that will factor into things at the start of the season.
But it seems the problem for women who are actually raped is how difficult it is to prove it (and a potential stigma) not being prosecuted for lying about the r*pe when they are telling the truth.Nope. I refuse to. The numbers show a huge blind spot in our system. The fact of the matter is that r*pe and sexual assault are under reported, under prosecuted and has a horrible conviction rate despite the fact that 95% plus of women who come forward aren’t full of shit. That’s all evidence of a huge problem.
I'm sure he wouldn't be thrilled if he did not win the job nor would Darnold. Darnold would have the leg up being healthier and knowing the system. But, hell, Baker did OK in 2020 when he didn't really know the system and was dealing with a Covid training camp.Yeah, from what has been reported, neither is going in as the presumed starter. Supposedly it's going to be a real competition.
No idea about Bakers recovery timeline. But from the way folks are talking, it sounds like he should be good to go at the start of training camp.
Stay classy.Go fuck yourself
Even if Darnold wins the job.....by week 3-4 Baker should be starting since Rhule is on the hottest coaching seat in the NFL.I'm sure he wouldn't be thrilled if he did not win the job nor would Darnold. Darnold would have the leg up being healthier and knowing the system. But, hell, Baker did OK in 2020 when he didn't really know the system and was dealing with a Covid training camp.
Should be interesting.
If a guy beat an actual rap in court why would he want to go into court again on the matter? You are not making much sense here.You’re seeing my concern come to fruition now in the abortion debate. Poorly worded trigger laws are leaving people in the wind. Unclear wording creates a layer of concern in whether or not a pregnant cancer patient can receive life extending or life saving chemotherapy. That was never the intent of these laws but all the same, people are likely to be caught in the cross hairs. My fear is what keeps a person from beating the wrap in court and then with that acquittal taking it to push an investigation of the accuser? That makes bad worse.
They don’t come forward because the cost benefit analysis is horribly skewed. Even if they come forward and they beat the stats to have the best outcome possible here’s what they win:But it seems the problem for women who are actually raped is how difficult it is to prove it (and a potential stigma) not being prosecuted for lying about the r*pe when they are telling the truth.
Because he’s vindictive and he wants to see his accuser suffer.If a guy beat an actual rap in court why would he want to go into court again on the matter? You are not making much sense here.
Yeah, from what has been reported, neither is going in as the presumed starter. Supposedly it's going to be a real competition.
No idea about Bakers recovery timeline. But from the way folks are talking, it sounds like he should be good to go at the start of training camp.
As someone that watched every college game he played I’ll say I would be shocked if Mayfield doesn’t win the job. His entire game is based on having a back against the wall attitude. He has more talent than Darnold anyway, but I see no way he loses an honest competition after all he has been through.
OK, but nothing would happen if their accusations were only deemed to be a lie. would take a bit more than that.They don’t come forward because the cost benefit analysis is horribly skewed. Even if they come forward and they beat the stats to have the best outcome possible here’s what they win:
1. They relive their r*pe through the investigation and trial.
2. Their past decision making is put on trial as the go to defense is to make the accuser out to be a promiscuous whore who was asking for the sexual experience.
3. Even when a conviction is attained you will often get sentencing like the Stanford swimmer case where the judge didn’t want to ruin his life so he gave him like 2-3 months.
And all of this happens if they beat the odds and things go right.
So we’re talking about adding another layer to that with the potential threat their accusation will be deemed to be a lie and now they could face prosecution on top of being assaulted? All this increased emphasis would do is discourage women from coming forward and that’s already a condition that exists. This would just make it worse.
I'm sure he wouldn't be thrilled if he did not win the job nor would Darnold. Darnold would have the leg up being healthier and knowing the system. But, hell, Baker did OK in 2020 when he didn't really know the system and was dealing with a Covid training camp.
Should be interesting.
But who is the one who has to prosecute the case? It would be the DA office who likely thinks he committed the crime since we are talking about someone who did commit the crime in this case. As I said, you are not making much sense here. Not that I expect you'd own you are not making much sense.Because he’s vindictive and he wants to see his accuser suffer.
Sure would....it's already been decided though, right?I agree with Cowherd...Carolina would be great for Hard Knocks. lol
Would it? You can’t make that promise.OK, but nothing would happen if their accusations were only deemed to be a lie. would take a bit more than that.
If I were not making sense I would own it. Your math only accounts for a criminal case. You aren’t even considering the possibility of a civil case. When I’m wrong I’ll own it as I have in the past. You need to do a better job to establish that. Will you own that you haven’t even considered the possibility of civil suits in this new focus you and others are putting forth?But who is the one who has to prosecute the case? It would be the DA office who likely thinks he committed the crime since we are talking about someone who did commit the crime in this case. As I said, you are not making much sense here. Not that I expect you'd own you are not making much sense.
They don’t come forward because the cost benefit analysis is horribly skewed. Even if they come forward and they beat the stats to have the best outcome possible here’s what they win:
1. They relive their r*pe through the investigation and trial.
2. Their past decision making is put on trial as the go to defense is to make the accuser out to be a promiscuous whore who was asking for the sexual experience.
3. Even when a conviction is attained you will often get sentencing like the Stanford swimmer case where the judge didn’t want to ruin his life so he gave him like 2-3 months.
And all of this happens if they beat the odds and things go right.
So we’re talking about adding another layer to that with the potential threat their accusation will be deemed to be a lie and now they could face prosecution on top of being assaulted? All this increased emphasis would do is discourage women from coming forward and that’s already a condition that exists. This would just make it worse.
Sure would....it's already been decided though, right?