- Thread starter
- #67,841
That's not good. Don't know anything about him personally.
24 for 140 say otherwise
Was talking football with a kid the other day. He asked me if I would rather try to tackle Derrick Henry, or get tackled by Ray Lewis.
Pretty easy decision.
Give me Henry.
Because I can always just get out the way before he runs me over. Ray Lewis coming at me is going to be painful no matter what.
Khalil looks like he was taking my approach on that play. Business decision.
This was expected, up until now it’s all been about not getting into the playoff. Now people will bitch that others have it better. Just what people do.What?
How is 5 more attractive than 1?
Makes no sense.
Is he saying that just because the projected 4 seed is weak while 1 potentially plays Georgia?
That is a seeding problem, not a format problem.
It makes a lot of sense actuallyWhat?
How is 5 more attractive than 1?
Makes no sense.
Is he saying that just because the projected 4 seed is weak while 1 potentially plays Georgia?
That is a seeding problem, not a format problem.
Neither went undefeated or they wouldn’t have issues like that, it’s that simple, you are there deal with whatever.It makes a lot of sense actually
5 seed gets Boise or the big 12 winner while the top seed get a big boy. Not fair
As a top seed you supposed to have easiest path
A potential path to the finals for the top seed as of the current rankings would be Georgia and Ohio state. Why should 1 and 2 face prior to the finals?
It makes a lot of sense actually
5 seed gets Boise or the big 12 winner while the top seed get a big boy. Not fair
As a top seed you supposed to have easiest path
A potential path to the finals for the top seed as of the current rankings would be Georgia and Ohio state. Why should 1 and 2 face prior to the finals?
Eh…
Just take that Georgia team and make them the 7 seed.
Then it is all better.
Doesn’t matter about Georgia. Whoever the top seed play is going to be much better than the team the 5 seed is playing and that’s a problem. 5 seed shouldn’t have an easier matchup than the top 3 seeeds
Sure.
But the conference champs also should get the first round bye because they don’t play equal schedules.
Only solution is go to 16 and literally just seed them NCAA style.
If the top 6 are all Big 10 and SEC then so be it.
I have no issue with the conference champs getting a bye. I do think it should be reseeded after round 1 though to make sure the top seed is facing the lowest seeded team
Plus everyone just needs to chill and think back to even before the bcs and how far things have came. Just enjoy it.Agree. I think part of the problem is that there's a pretty lucrative cottage industry around brackets and "bracketology" that would get a whole lot more complicated.
I have no issue with the conference champs getting a bye. I do think it should be reseeded after round 1 though to make sure the top seed is facing the lowest seeded team
Yup and they would have done it with the advantage of a bye week. Without the bye week in an 8 team playoff that’s the matchup anyway.This.
If number 1 loses to 8 then they don’t deserve to win the title.
This.
If number 1 loses to 8 then they don’t deserve to win the title.
The story is that his brother and father transferred money out of his business account into their own accounts. They were caught and were supposed to start repaying monthly in September but have yet to make a payment.