I agree, I think GS will start to hit some rough times, not by losing the core stars, but when their depth starts getting hit...Like when some team offers big money to an Iggy or a Livingston, and guys like that, usually the dynasties start to crumble when the really good depth gets thinner
But agree, thats not for a few years
@WiggyRuss told me different, and his word is gospel to me.
Since when did you believe anything Wiggy has to say?I still remember his posts about how Lebron's going to do so much better with Cleveland than he did with Miami. By his definition, Cleveland was a super team.
Only after he convinces Gilbert he'll only stay if they trade their draft pick right now for Shabazz Napier, then leaves in the offseason. Then the Cavs will be locked into Cap hell for the next few years having to pay monstrous contracts to Lebron's friends and Lebron gets to chase rings elsewhere.
Heat were a super team because Bosh was so much better than Love IMO.
I also don't like judging superteams by # of all stars.
A few years ago the 60+ win Hawks team had 3 or 4 all stars if I remember correctly.
Were they a superteam?
you could easily make arguments for or againstI still remember his posts about how Lebron's going to do so much better with Cleveland than he did with Miami. By his definition, Cleveland was a super team.
he should have...never would have been flat out wrong on so many things...lolSince when did you believe anything Wiggy has to say?
hmmmm....i dunno if i totally agree with you but your post on super teams is the post that i have seen that i agree with the most.My definition of a superteam is 2 top 10 players and another player who is top 20-25.
IMO, Kyrie was never a top 10 player in Cleveland.
Wade was a top 10 player IMO in the first 2 years of the big 3 in Miami.
I don't think they were a superteam in year 3 or 4.
It could just be me, I just never saw the Bosh and Love versions that played with Lebron as great players,
All i remember was bashing Bosh for his refusal to go near the basket as a Heat player
Just hanging by that 3 point line
I dunno, i just saw Bosh much like i see Love today, good, but not great
On paper they have 3 all stars, one of which is/was Lebron. That's a super team. Just like the Heat were considered a super team. Golden St. just updated the term when they added Durant.
he should have...never would have been flat out wrong on so many things...lol
it is funny to hear certain people rip on Love and then in the next sentence say the Cavs are a super team like some people have (not you).,Heat were a super team because Bosh was so much better than Love IMO.
I also don't like judging superteams by # of all stars.
A few years ago the 60+ win Hawks team had 3 or 4 all stars if I remember correctly.
Were they a superteam?
I still remember his posts about how Lebron's going to do so much better with Cleveland than he did with Miami. By his definition, Cleveland was a super team.
you could easily make arguments for or against
what is a "super team"?
what is your definition?
A team doesn't have to be successful to be a super team.
Heck, the failed super teams are more fun because we get to mock them.
I still remember his posts about how Lebron's going to do so much better with Cleveland than he did with Miami. By his definition, Cleveland was a super team.