Rock Strongo
My mind spits with an enormous kickback.
jesus, since 2007 bradys averaged 7 picks a season.
01-06 it was nearly double that, at 13
01-06 it was nearly double that, at 13
Wait. Either he's playing at his best at age 40, and therefore on PEDs like you said a page ago, and now he's on the way out?!? What gives?!
Not really a dick. More like a two inch clit with a set of tiny balls attached to it.
its his "worst" since 2014...when he was 33/9
hes 30/8 now. outside shot of matching or beating that. seriously, its being asked to repeat perfection just about. hard to do.
yeah, thats concerning as all fuck.Gotcha, thats probably what I heard..........5 straight games with an INT is also pretty hard to do
jesus, since 2007 bradys averaged 7 picks a season.
01-06 it was nearly double that, at 13
Heh I've seen some QBs throw 5 in a gameyeah, thats concerning as all fuck.
and theyre all just bad decisions on his part. 6 in his last 5...not a good look. his rating over his last 5 games?
an eli like 88.5
Gotcha, thats probably what I heard..........5 straight games with an INT is also pretty hard to do
that pick six was brutal.Heh I've seen some QBs throw 5 in a game
jesus, since 2007 bradys averaged 7 picks a season.
01-06 it was nearly double that, at 13
Heh I've seen some QBs throw 5 in a game
you're right. bradys jacked like barry was. the change is undeniable.they started throwing more screens
you know who else improved a lot at such an old age? bonds. barry bonds.
That's when they enforced the 5 yard no contact rule after Peyton and Polian went on whining. In 01-6 Brady had best td/int ration of all time at like 2.7 to one and now he is over 6-1.
I thought the plastic pellets on the toe drag that occurred about the time of possession could only be seen from the side view angle of the endzone, and that possession could only be seen from the back view angle of the endzone. While I believed he dragged his toe once he had possession, I didn't think it met the clear and obvious standard of review.but you thought it was incomplete?
there was apparently plenty of evidence in the last angle, which is what got it overturned.
thats fair. i DO get what people are talking about. its kinda bullshit, this 45 angle "catch or no catch, i see a puff of dirt" is insane. but they made it this way, and per the rule...that wasnt a catch. i revert to "clear and obvious". i stand by that.I thought the plastic pellets on the toe drag that occurred about the time of possession could only be seen from the side view angle of the endzone, and that possession could only be seen from the back view angle of the endzone. While I believed he dragged his toe once he had possession, I didn't think it met the clear and obvious standard of review.
So were the one to call the play it would have had to be challenged by rule inside of two minutes and from what I saw, I would have reviewed it as the plays stands. Basically what I am saying, it I would have called it wrong on the field and their wouldn't be enough evidence to overturn the ruling on the field, and likewise I think the actual review booth on this play got it wrong because there was not enough evidence to overturn the ruling on the field.
Bottom line, I think the Bills got screwed out of 4 points by rule, but to make excuses about losing the game because of a momentum swing going into the half is a load of crap. The Bills lost that game because they didn't make the right half time adjustments and the Pats did.
peyton looks even more ridiculous now that he stopped working out. hes got a lil belly going, his bodys shrunk...and his heads the same size. looks like he could tip over.When Peyton retired he gave Brady his HGH prescription. I have no proof of this but it still sounds legit.
When Peyton retired he gave Brady his HGH prescription. I have no proof of this but it still sounds legit.
peyton looks even more ridiculous now that he stopped working out. hes got a lil belly going, his bodys shrunk...and his heads the same size. looks like he could tip over.