deep9er
Well-Known Member
The second 3rd rounder would be a 2014 pick. That was the scenario brought up by the guy who started the thread.
rather we not trade our 2014 3rd rounder, under this scenario i'd trade the Lattimore pick instead.
The second 3rd rounder would be a 2014 pick. That was the scenario brought up by the guy who started the thread.
Desmond Trufant is going to be around in the second round. No need to move up in the first to get him. Get him early in the second though by trading a 3rd and our 2nd
rather we not trade our 2014 3rd rounder, under this scenario i'd trade the Lattimore pick instead.
Oh and I hope Detone Jones is not our first round pick.
our 2nd rounder is at #31 in the second(63ovr), so imo it would be too much to give up 63 ovr AND 65 over AND a 3rd next year. I think NE would be up for doing however the 63 ovr, 75-78ovr(whatever carolina ends up being), and our 3rd next year.
so, two third round picks and a second round pick in this years draft?
if there is a QB or pass rusher they REALLY want, i'd try to move up in the 1st? "easier said than done" and this isn't a likely scenario. if there were one of these guys, we couldn't trade high enough.
earlier i read an article saying this class is weak the top, but full of depth? if so, then consider moving up a 3rd into the 2nd round? use the extra 3rd, 4th, and 5th if necessary?
if we end up standing pat (no decent trades available), then look to trade our 4th, 5th, and 6th into 2014.
if there is a QB or pass rusher they REALLY want, i'd try to move up in the 1st? "easier said than done" and this isn't a likely scenario. if there were one of these guys, we couldn't trade high enough.
earlier i read an article saying this class is weak the top, but full of depth? if so, then consider moving up a 3rd into the 2nd round? use the extra 3rd, 4th, and 5th if necessary?
if we end up standing pat (no decent trades available), then look to trade our 4th, 5th, and 6th into 2014.
First, there's not. Second, we just saw our starting QB get off to arguably the best start any QB has had in the history of the league, and you want to use a first round pick on the position? What in the world for? To ride the pine behind Kap?
Not to mention that in the span of six years our current coach has turned a nobody at a minor college program into an NFL player, a good college player into the consensus #1 pick in the NFL draft, a widely regarded bust into a solid NFL starter, and a talented player from a gimmick system into a guy who led his team into the super bowl. Seems like he might be able to find a tolerable backup.
where i'm going with this?
to remind us we shouldn't overlook the QB position, no guarantee Kap is the guy for the next 10 years. if you see a franchise QB and he can be had (late 1st), you draft him. you can just think i have Kap so totally forget QB. Kap could get hurt or later on, he might be difficult to re-sign.
if Harbaugh thought there was another "Kap", but no one else sees it like him, would you pass?
but if there isn't one, then this shouldn't be an issue.
where i'm going with this?
to remind us we shouldn't overlook the QB position, no guarantee Kap is the guy for the next 10 years. if you see a franchise QB and he can be had (late 1st), you draft him. you can just think i have Kap so totally forget QB. Kap could get hurt or later on, he might be difficult to re-sign.
if Harbaugh thought there was another "Kap", but no one else sees it like him, would you pass?
but if there isn't one, then this shouldn't be an issue.
If there is a franchise QB to be had you do what the Rams did and you sell the pick to the highest bidder.
There is no guarantee that CK is the guy the next 10 years but there is even less guarantee that a QB taken in the 1st round is. At least with Kap there is a high quality body of NFL work to go on.
What you do is draft a raw talented QB in the later rounds, try to develop him, and if you're successful you can flip that 5th or 6th round investment into a 2nd round one.
Also our window is open right now. Granted you don't throw away the future for the sake of the present but you do need to lean more on being proactive in winning today not building for a future of maybes.
if there is a QB or pass rusher they REALLY want, i'd try to move up in the 1st? "easier said than done" and this isn't a likely scenario. if there were one of these guys, we couldn't trade high enough.
earlier i read an article saying this class is weak the top, but full of depth? if so, then consider moving up a 3rd into the 2nd round? use the extra 3rd, 4th, and 5th if necessary?
if we end up standing pat (no decent trades available), then look to trade our 4th, 5th, and 6th into 2014.
where i'm going with this?
to remind us we shouldn't overlook the QB position, no guarantee Kap is the guy for the next 10 years. if you see a franchise QB and he can be had (late 1st), you draft him. you can just think i have Kap so totally forget QB. Kap could get hurt or later on, he might be difficult to re-sign.
if Harbaugh thought there was another "Kap", but no one else sees it like him, would you pass?
but if there isn't one, then this shouldn't be an issue.
Just wondering here, what is it about Franklin that makes you more behind him? Not that I have seen him so I don't know much about Franklin, thanks
If there is a franchise QB to be had you do what the Rams did and you sell the pick to the highest bidder.
There is no guarantee that CK is the guy the next 10 years but there is even less guarantee that a QB taken in the 1st round is. At least with Kap there is a high quality body of NFL work to go on.
What you do is draft a raw talented QB in the later rounds, try to develop him, and if you're successful you can flip that 5th or 6th round investment into a 2nd round one.
Also our window is open right now. Granted you don't throw away the future for the sake of the present but you do need to lean more on being proactive in winning today not building for a future of maybes.
There's never a guarantee that a guy is "the guy" for the next 10 years. Should any team with a franchise QB burn its first pick - or more, as you've suggested trading up - on another QB? Should the Pats have been taking QBs with high picks for the last decade? Should Indy? That's just silly.
Furthermore, your entire premise that Harbaugh should take another Kap seems to suggest that Kap has more or less arrived.
Since we're living in hypothetical world here, what would you do if Harbaugh thought that there was a "Kap" type of guy available at 20, Deep? Would you trade our first and second round picks for him?