- Thread starter
- #1
Hope the Vikes don't upset him when he is menstruating.
He is a good pickup for Minny. He certainly will help. Got him cheap too.
I was curious if Wallace would compliment Jennings? Free him up a bit more? Deep threat is definitely a plus like you said. Will be interesting to see how things play out.Cheap is relative. Not much in the draft but quite a bit in contract. Essentially a 3 year $30 million contract with no cap ramifications if we severe ties with him the the future.
I wonder if it means Jennings is about to get cut though.
I do like the added deep threat.
Jennings might be on his way out of Minnesota.Clearly a good move for both teams...MIA really didn't use Wallace well in the games I did see...With Suh and company on the way in...they needed to move salary out, and this was a big one.
MIN...if they move Jennings and try to pick up that production with Wallace, it's not going to be a great move. Wallace is a good complementary player.
Jennings might be on his way out of Minnesota.
Charles Johnson looked pretty good last year. Patterson still needs to work on his routes but he could potentially be a top tier WR because of how athletic he is.This could blow up in their (MIN) face if the don't get a good underneath WR.
Patterson...the TN kid...started strong and faded uh...If you have a game plan to go deep at least 4 times a gm...Wallace can be effective on the deep out, the slant, screen, but he's not that across the shallow middle WR
Patterson...the TN kid...started strong and faded uh...If you have a game plan to go deep at least 4 times a gm...Wallace can be effective on the deep out, the slant, screen, but he's not that across the shallow middle WR