Used 2 B Hu
Baredevil
thats a lie!
Sorry...
"An engineering degree from a Division III school"
thats a lie!
We are the Champions my friend!
And we’ll keep on fighting till the end!
no, but the outcry is totally hypocritical, which was my statement.
So to sum up, the punishment of the Patriots is BS because Pete Carroll?
why is carroll being named in the suits then?What outcry is hypocritical? The Patriots were ALREADY proven cheaters. They got punished for failing to have proper controls to prevent this from happening. Thus they received a punishment that was likely based the fact that they are two time losers.
There is absolutely zero evidence that Pete Carroll had any knowledge of any PED use.You are making a baseless insinuation as a way to deflect away from the basic fact that the Patriots were actively caught cheating in multiple situations. What Pete Carroll did at USC has absolutely NOTHING to do with this topic.
yupDon't forget Ray Lewis and the Colts' organization.
yup
fellow cheaters. ray deserves an asterisk.
it has been for 50 years.Throw away the rulebook...right? Precedent has been set...cheating is now a full go.
it has been for 50 years.
because its true. you watch football right?Everyone understands why you think this.
why is carroll being named in the suits then?
why did seattles PED busts go sky high when he got there vs prior?
again, other fan bases crying "cheaters" are hypocrites.
Because law suits name EVERYONE they can.
6 in 5 years is sky high? OK, sure. I guess the Bucs 5 and the Phish's 4 is no big deal? And given how the team was the most active team in terms of personnel changes for Carrol's first 3 seasons, it shouldn't come as much of a surprise that they had guys using PEDs. Is there ANY evidence that the team was aware of it?
I honestly don't give a shit about the Patriots cheating. But there are about 2 or 3 threads a day that Patriot fans post here whining about the horror of the punishment.
Well for one your owner is eating his crow. I guess you'll settle for saying "Yeah, but he didn't appeal."All good points. However, the precedent shows that EVERYONE beats Goodell on appeal. Why would this be any different? Especially when this one has less evidence than Bountygate, Ray Rice and Adrian Peterson did. And they all won on appeal.
guilt by association works in the court system, it works for me here.Certainly no evidence. Just guilt by insinuation.