- Thread starter
- #1
PolarVortex
Nanook of the North
First, as a Seahawk fan, let me say this up front: this isn't a troll thread. I personally think it would be kinda cool if Lynch got to finish his career in a community that he obviously has strong ties with.
But, if Oakland wants Lynch to be in their backfield in 2017, they will have to pay Seattle $2.5 million up front before they even start negotiating a trade.
When Lynch signed a new contract extension in 2015, he got a $7.5 million signing bonus. Because he retired, $2.5 million of that money is supposed to be returned to the Seahawks. As long as he stayed retired, Paul Allen was not going to ask for the money back. But if he comes out of retirement to play for the Raiders, Allen will expect the $2.5 million to be returned to the Seahawk organization before trade talks commence.
Long story short - the Raiders aren't going to write that check just for the rights to negotiate a trade for a 31-year-old running back. No Marshawn Lynch comeback in Oakland. Let this 'non news' die right here.
But, if Oakland wants Lynch to be in their backfield in 2017, they will have to pay Seattle $2.5 million up front before they even start negotiating a trade.
When Lynch signed a new contract extension in 2015, he got a $7.5 million signing bonus. Because he retired, $2.5 million of that money is supposed to be returned to the Seahawks. As long as he stayed retired, Paul Allen was not going to ask for the money back. But if he comes out of retirement to play for the Raiders, Allen will expect the $2.5 million to be returned to the Seahawk organization before trade talks commence.
Long story short - the Raiders aren't going to write that check just for the rights to negotiate a trade for a 31-year-old running back. No Marshawn Lynch comeback in Oakland. Let this 'non news' die right here.