- Thread starter
- #1
noonthirtyjoe
tool
Howard >>>>> Monty. Thanks Nagy. I blame BS75 for Nagy focusing on Seattle.
Durrrrrrrrrrrr um Howard is good. Durrrrrr ummmmm Montgomery is bad. Durrrrrrrrrrr.
Stfu @noonthirtyjoe at least keep your dumb fuckery to one thread.
Durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.They're both good backs.
Stuff it bitch.Durrrrrrrrrrrr um Howard is good. Durrrrrr ummmmm Montgomery is bad. Durrrrrrrrrrr.
Stfu @noonthirtyjoe at least keep your dumb fuckery to one thread.
Ya his TD passes don't count, all he can do is run and score TDs.Durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
Howard is 1 dimensional.
We hope it's both.They're both good backs.
Durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
Howard is 1 dimensional.
I thought the line played pretty decently in protecting Daniel, but agree with you on the run blocking. It was really bad.Howard wouldn’t have done any better behind this line. They can’t block.
Ya his TD passes don't count, all he can do is run and score TDs.
This thread is stupid. Howard has a big game, so noon and company jump all over it. Howard was good when all we did was run. Montgomery is better for this offense though. Howard wouldn’t being doing jack shit behind this oline either. I’m sick of the stupidity on this board. Sorry if I offended your delicate sensibilities.So are you taking on the obnoxious persona now?
This thread is stupid. Howard has a big game, so noon and company jump all over it. Howard was good when all we did was run. Montgomery is better for this offense though. Howard wouldn’t being doing jack shit behind this oline either. I’m sick of the stupidity on this board. Sorry if I offended your delicate sensibilities.
Naturally, the king of stupid has to respond with a novel. Didn’t even read it, bro. Everything you post turns out to be wrong.Just a friendly thought...
Lately, it seems that you have been conveying your disagreement with other people's opinions by calling them names, mocking them or throwing them a rating of some sort. Cutting out and all attempts at civil communication. It's 0 to 60. Straight to attack mode.
It also seems that you're taking this route when you disagree with the Bears coaching staff or become critical of a player in a game thread. "This player sucks!" or "Fire this coach for that isolated decision now!" with no further elaboration as to why. With posters it's "You're a moron. Hur durr. You're a fucking idiot and I don't care to explain my position to you". That sort of thing.
We all have these moments. I used to do it quite a bit. This is just what I have found helps me...
Perhaps if you would elaborate on your thoughts and opinions. If you would explain your position to someone, instead of calling them names... That you would find that your interactions on here will be much more pleasant. You will understand their position a bit better. In turn, no further hostility will be created and they will probably respond to you in kind. They'll be more open to understanding those highly intelligent football views of yours. You will be much more likely to come closer to meeting in the middle or at least leaving the interaction with some respect for a different viewpoint.
Remember, you have to take it easy on us football peasants
This thread is stupid. Howard has a big game, so noon and company jump all over it. Howard was good when all we did was run. Montgomery is better for this offense though. Howard wouldn’t being doing jack shit behind this oline either. I’m sick of the stupidity on this board. Sorry if I offended your delicate sensibilities.
Did you see the play? There wasn't a player 15 yards from him. He walked into the endzone w/out being touched. Yet another example where stats don't tell the story. The genius sees through stats.
Howard needs holes to succeed, big holes. When gets them, he has a good day. When he doesn't he sucks. He had many big holes that day.
Agreed. Yes, Howard had a few holes opened to him that a mack truck could have driven thru. But he also moved the chains a few times on some tough runs. I don't care if one is pro or anti Howard, by any normal thinking, purely analytical standards, he had a very good night against the Packers.Every back needs holes to succeed. Unless you think 21 rushes for 53 yards is some great success? I bet Montgomery would have a bunch more success if our o-line would open up a few holes during the game.
What a ridiculous argument.