- Thread starter
- #1
I'll take being worth nearly $225 mill and a Rose Bowl win over being worth $732 mill and getting blown out of the Buffalo Wild Wings Bowl. What do I care what the team is worth as long as they are putting out a quality product?
I'll take being worth nearly $225 mill and a Rose Bowl win over being worth $732 mill and getting blown out of the Buffalo Wild Wings Bowl. What do I care what the team is worth as long as they are putting out a quality product?
Chart is a year old, done before that blowout and before the risk of a new AD and coach at Texas.
Don't think that it is going to be that huge of a difference. Texas and Michigan have been the most valuable names for a long time. He can keep his valuable team, I would prefer to keep my producing team (know it won't be long til we are in the middle of the B1G standings again).
1. Texas: 8-5
2. Michigan: 7-6
3. Florida: 4-8
You're focused on the wrong thing. Dollar signs are all that matters... not records. The big ten just took in Maryland and Rutgers. Do you think that has anything to do w/making the big ten better and more competative?
They are 56th and 63rd on the chart of 69 schools. Don't think that they are bringing that much more into the conference and once you start cutting the bowl money into even smaller pieces, it won't be a wise decision.
The focus was on television, not bowl games or anything else. Signing those teams allows the BIG to tap into that market and I don't know exact numbers, but I believe they reached a multi-billion dollar deal w/cable providers... the BIG network being a big part of it. West Virginia would have brought more to table for us fans, but there's no money in that area... hence money drives all in sports.
yup they have breached ACC country. not to mention NY.