lasgop8
Lets do this!
lol, do it.. i meant i was being a smartass though haha.. cause you seemed to take exception to the 'flashes of brilliance' comment
![Loco 2 :loco2: :loco2:](/images/smilies2/loco2.gif)
![Wink ;) ;)](/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
lol, do it.. i meant i was being a smartass though haha.. cause you seemed to take exception to the 'flashes of brilliance' comment
Flashes of brilliance??????????? I am laughing so hard i spit my beer out. A handful of games yes brilliant,three years minus a handful of games he stunk. when i say stunk i mean no checking, no passing, not in front of the net ,not a leader just totally invisible. I'm just happy other GM's are still interested we should take what we could get and move on.
fify?
and if so, party foul?
We just got rid of a 40 goal scorer who has done nothing else on the ice but score in Carter and look how bad that hurt us. We need a top 4 dman way more than we need a guy who may or may not delvelop into this scoring machine but realistically he does nothing else other than score if he even does mature into that player that you think. there are so many more parts of the game JVR doesnt do now nor will ever be able to do. Top 4 dman right now might bring us the cup this year and/ or maybe next year a lot more than waiting for this kid to do anything on the ice.
then again, if you move briere you gotta think about the lack of playoff experience on the team.. you're then down to jvr, giroux, jagr, and talbot with solid playoff experience up front.. and the top 4 on D.. and very little quality experience in net
i'm not sure i'm comfortable w/ that
really i'm just uncomfortable with trading at this point haha.. jvr for schenn straight up seems alright to me, but that seems like a dead rumor these days.. could jvr get someone like jack johnson from the kings? i dno.. i dont really wanna trade jvr, but i think moving him for a defensemen that's at a similar level as him (not really a prospect anymore, but not fully developed) is the only route the flyers can go that i will like
I never said that I thought JVR would only be a goal scorer and weak in every other facet of the games. When he is physical(albeit it's rare this year) he is one of the toughest Flyers to get off the puck, he has great vision on the ice and he has incredible speed. Now I will say he is a bit weak on the defensive side of the puck, but he's 22. Briere is by far the worst defensive F we have on the team and his offensive production has been jack shit, if anything he's hurting our PP by not being able to control the puck or make a simple pass. Then there is the difference in the 2.25m a year in cap hit between the 2 players, not to mention one is 22 and the other is 34. Your argument of keeping Briere over JVR makes no sense to me, I know you'll say the playoffs but let's be honest with the way he's been playing this year do you really expect anything out of him the in playoffs? Teams have figured him out and he hasn't compensated for it. Simply put he's too small and weak to be a center and he's a huge defensive liability, plus we have enough "veteran guys" who have been to the playoffs to keep the team calm(not that I really think any of our young guys need a lesson in poise after what they've shown so far this season).
You say JVR is a buts, I disagree and will guarantee if we trade him to an eastern conference team he will haunt us for the rest of his career.
i dunno, this nhl is much different than years back when you needed a lot of veteran presence. look at chicago when thye beat us for an example. not too many of their guys were playoff experienced.
i think if you look at trading briere, for a dman you rely on your youth forwards to play as they did in the regular season. most of your veteran presence would have to come from your dmen (coburn, mez, carle, kimo, maybe the aquired dman). leaving g, jvr, hartnell, jagr, talbot as your presence on the offensive side.
the more i talk about this the more i talk myself into liking the idea of moving briere for the dman we need.
i dunno, this nhl is much different than years back when you needed a lot of veteran presence. look at chicago when thye beat us for an example. not too many of their guys were playoff experienced.
i think if you look at trading briere, for a dman you rely on your youth forwards to play as they did in the regular season. most of your veteran presence would have to come from your dmen (coburn, mez, carle, kimo, maybe the aquired dman). leaving g, jvr, hartnell, jagr, talbot as your presence on the offensive side.
the more i talk about this the more i talk myself into liking the idea of moving briere for the dman we need.
las i wanna know how you really feel about JvR.. this fence sitting is getting old..![]()
Thats a good one you said JVR and offensive presence in one sentence, thats like jumbo shrimp right.
lol, i meant he would be one of the team members considered your veteran offensive presence :wacko:
If JVR is traded for equal talent I'm fine with it, so I'll list what value should be.
JVR, Carle & 1st for Weber
JVR & 2nd fort Suter(only with an extension in place)
JVR & 2nd/3rd for Schenn & 1st, Jack Johnson and a 1st or Yandle & a 1st(could throw Bogosian in that list)
Another trade that I'd like to see discussed with Tor would be JVR, Carle & 2nd for Schenn, Franson & a 1st as I think that would help both teams out alot
With all that said I'd still rather Briere to STL for Shattenkirk And a2nd
If JVR is traded for equal talent I'm fine with it, so I'll list what value should be.
JVR, Carle & 1st for Weber
JVR & 2nd fort Suter(only with an extension in place)
JVR & 2nd/3rd for Schenn & 1st, Jack Johnson and a 1st or Yandle & a 1st(could throw Bogosian in that list)
Another trade that I'd like to see discussed with Tor would be JVR, Carle & 2nd for Schenn, Franson & a 1st as I think that would help both teams out alot
With all that said I'd still rather Briere to STL for Shattenkirk And a2nd