PDay8810
Well-Known Member
For the record: NOYou can plug and play at the RB position and still win.
For the record: NOYou can plug and play at the RB position and still win.
The NFL remains all about the guaranteed money, all else if fluff. Players know this, fans, not so muchLook at any team cap situation and you'll see cutting almost any player involves eating dead money because of signing bonuses and such which is pay in advance for years on the contract.
For the record: Yes.For the record: NO
Wait, the 2 greatest QBs of our generation need less help than most?For the record: Yes.
Look at Bucs with Brady and the Chiefs with Mahomes....that is just 2 teams in the past few years.
It just shows it's a passing League....Wait, the 2 greatest QBs of our generation need less help than most?
No it does not, it shows that if you take the greatest QB of all time, and the one QB that has a chance to pass him, then rules change.It just shows it's a passing League....
Right..mahomes and BradyFor the record: Yes.
Look at Bucs with Brady and the Chiefs with Mahomes....that is just 2 teams in the past few years.
You have to remember, WR also do not matter, because Chiefs traded away their one elite WR and still won the SuperBowl!Right..mahomes and Brady
You should ask their opinion
Weak sause.How many SB's have Henry, Cook, Jacobs, Barkley and Chubb won?
5 of the best RB's in the League....
Never said that.Point Guards don't matter because Jokic is on the Nuggets!
It is exactly the case you made against Running backs. Just changes sports.Never said that.
"400% raise" is a mentally ill way to portray it.Trading him now means relying on cast-offs and/or late draft picks this season when they are trying to introduce a raw rookie QB. What are they going to get in return?
They very well might have been interested in extending him, but then he asks for $18M per. A 400% raise is probably not what they were looking to pay. Certainly seems like they were discussing extension until $18M was introduced.
JT is not the receiving threat they are either, he had one outstanding year and a really good year, followed by a year of injuries, he isn't worth the same as those two. I personally would sign him to 4 yrs, about 12 mill per."400% raise" is a mentally ill way to portray it.
Kamara got 15 per. McCaffrey got 16.
No it does not, it shows that if you take the greatest QB of all time, and the one QB that has a chance to pass him, then rules change.
Henry got 12.5 three years ago before contracts spiked.JT is not the receiving threat they are either, he had one outstanding year and a really good year, followed by a year of injuries, he isn't worth the same as those two. I personally would sign him to 4 yrs, about 12 mill per.
"400% raise" is a mentally ill way to portray it.
Kamara got 15 per. McCaffrey got 16.