It's like that D Jax?

[kbso83432]

Brandon Graham: DeSean Jackson says 'he'll be back' with Eagles

 

[Darrell Green Fan]

I called this a month ago. That team is desperate for help there and out bid us, probably overpaying in the process. Hell he probably still has a house in Philly.

 

[Buffalo_Nickel_1]

o well just draft dede westbrook

 

[Buffalo_Nickel_1]

watch dede highlight on youtube this kid is djax part 2

 

[kbso83432]

I'd hate to lose Jackson.

 

[kbso83432]

Pierre Garcon Eyeing Redskins Return?
Pierre Garcon Eyeing Redskins Return?

 

[skinsdad62]

rumors are rumors

 

[gkekoa]

DJ will go where he is paid.

 

[skinz2winz]

Not hurting to throw things out there to raise value, right? I know DJax (not used in WASH to his full potential) will get paid, but starting the rumor mill of going back to Philly only drives up his market value and places all pressure on WASH to resign him because of his specific skill set. (Speed) There are obvious reasons to bring him back but are there more reasons to let him walk? Since DJax has been with Washington, lets ask ourselves a few questions that may lead to bringing him back or not. To shorten the post, I will state my answers to my questions and you can remove my answers and insert yours. And no, I don't think DJax will be back next year as he always wanted to be an Eagle, (Kelly screwed that up) and he is upset with the low amount of touches he receives. I really believe that is why we have seen him more involved that past few weeks. I think he should be resigned and let Garcon walk however, I don't think that will happen because he has likely already made his mind up.

Let's really break it down regarding DJax:
Is he a great teammate?
A: No for several reasons
Does he commit to team first?
A: No for several reasons
Can he play 16 games regularly?
A: No
Is he a difference maker?
A: Yes, when used properly

HTTR!

 

[Sportster 72]

LOL, what does several reasons mean. Of course I mean reasons and not opinions. You can use opinions but you need to call them that unless you know it to be true.

 

[skinz2winz]

LOL, what does several reasons mean. Of course I mean reasons and not opinions. You can use opinions but you need to call them that unless you know it to be true.

Those reasons are fairly obvious if you are a skins fan Sportster. I figured you and many others senior posters/fans have noticed those reasons the past 3 seasons DJax has been in DC. I know for me a reason would be: DJax chooses to miss OTA's and other team activities because he is super busy with other personal commitments. To me, that is REASON enough to know he is not a "team first" type of player. If you ask any coach or front office personnel what they want in a player whether it be draftee or FA, it will be a team first kind of person/player. There are other reasons but I didn't think I would have to go into great detail for such Sr. posters like yourself. I guess I was wrong.

HTTR!

 

[Breed]

I called this a month ago. That team is desperate for help there and out bid us, probably overpaying in the process. Hell he probably still has a house in Philly.

You also believed that Jackson was rollin hard with LA gang members and that's why Chip Kelly released him which was bullshit. And that he'd be run outta DC in 3 years tops for being a knucklehead. And while he certianly has had some knucklehedads moments during his Skins tenure. I wouldn't be surprised if he reads message boards and online newspaper polls and that. All those ass0 fans in Philly who were talkin that Chip Kelly is a football god nonsense and fuck me-sean after he left Philly. Have been crying like sand filled vagina bitches the last couple years. While ass0 fans in DC have been talkin shit calling him a one trick pony and me-sean the last couple years and he's eatin all that shit up.

I'd be surprised though if he didn't try and make a move or at least put out some feelers about going back to LA as a Ram. Especially as the Rams finally got rid of Jeff Fisher's player kliller and team killer ass.

 

[gkekoa]

I am not sure about us not using him correctly. His numbers here are basically what they were with PHI.

 

[skinz2winz]

I am not sure about us not using him correctly. His numbers here are basically what they were with PHI.

I think he deserves and should get more touches which I have seen the past 3 weeks.

 

[Breed]

watch dede highlight on youtube this kid is djax part 2

There's some dude on an NFL team named Dede that's legitinmately one of thye best and argubaly the best deep thtreat in the NFL? What team does he play for?

 

[Breed]

I think he deserves and should get more touches which I have seen the past 3 weeks.

Agreed. When was the last time they threw him one of those behind the LOS screen passes?

Edit:
Then again. Looking at the stats. While he's played one less game than Garcon and JC. JC only has 1 more target for the year than Jax and garcon only Pierre only has 12 more targets.

What I should've said is. I wish he and Cuz coiuld've gotten on the same page quicker this year.

 

[Breed]

I used up my 10 minute time slot to edit my post.

Pierre only has 12 more targets than Jackson and JC one more t6arget and they each played one game more than Jackson. What I should've said is. I wish Djax and Cuz coiuld've gotten on the same page quicker this year.

 

[Buffalo_Nickel_1]

dede westbrook will be in the draft he plays for oklahoma but i think u was just being a smart ass lol

 

[Sharkinva]

dede westbrook will be in the draft he plays for oklahoma but i think u was just being a smart ass lol

Westbrook is a projected 2nd rounder and if he has a god combine might slide into the first round.

With a team devoid of Defensive talent, why would any one find it logical to yet again ignore the defense to take another high round WR?? If they dont resign Jackson, than another Veteran with some speed needs to be brought in.

 

[Buffalo_Nickel_1]

im like on djax if he stays he stays if he walks he walks we will win with him and win without him less bombs and a better running game will equal his production for a cheaper price