- Thread starter
- #21
belcherboy
Well-Known Member
Funny i seem to remember SC having titles stripped along with the death penalty
Death penalty? So they weren't allowed to play football (i.e. SMU)?
Again, "officially" they are gone, but ask any college football fan who watched those games, "Who won?" The same thing goes for who won the ACC title in 2009. Just about anyone (including fans) following that season are going to say Georgia Tech. Technically they didn't win it because it was stripped, but that doesn't matter. People own t-shirts, hats, and everything else that says their team won.
If they really wanted to hurt those teams, they would have instituted the "death penalty" like you said above, but the NCAA knows that they will never do that again. They acted like they were going to do it to Penn St, but there is WAY too much money involved to hold a team under water till they die. Act tough, take away something that most people will forget about, and force them to play with a few less scholarships for a few years. Many times dishing out penalties for things that they really can't prove, while turning away from teams that created a WHOLE lot of smoke IMO (i.e. Johnny Football money, Cam Newton, etc.)