ElPatron1
Well-Known Member
He is just mid
Won't help your team win and can't rebuild because you won't get draft picks
Won't help your team win and can't rebuild because you won't get draft picks
It's interesting, this notion that teams should either have a top-ten QB or trash so they can try to draft one.He is just mid
Won't help your team win and can't rebuild because you won't get draft picks
I think top ten is kind of a meaningless distinction right now. For me, its 'do you trust your QB if you draft well and coach well?' and with Baker its yes.It's interesting, this notion that teams should either have a top-ten QB or trash so they can try to draft one.
I think @ElPatron1's idea is that if you don't have a QB who can win you a super bowl, you should tank.I think top ten is kind of a meaningless distinction right now. For me, its 'do you trust your QB if you draft well and coach well?' and with Baker its yes.
He is also technically a bust like Goff and Darnold since he isnt on the team that drafted him. But its not Baker's fault the team isnt still playing.
Of the top 4 QBs in the league, only 1 has won a Super Bowl and two haven't even been.I think @ElPatron1's idea is that if you don't have a QB who can win you a super bowl, you should tank.
I know. His opinion is a popular one, though.Of the top 4 QBs in the league, only 1 has won a Super Bowl and two haven't even been.
while I liked the deal at the time and my guess is any NFL team needing QB at the time takes Watson over Baker (as evidenced by offers for each).....but 100% agree Browns would undo that deal if we could and just keep Baker. and, no, he's not a bust by any stretch.It’s absurd to call Baker a bust, he’s a very good QB. He’s led the Bucs to two straight division titles and has played very well both years. I guarantee the Browns wish they had stuck with Baker instead of giving washed up Watson a huge deal. I like Baker and think he’ll continue to have success in Tampa - the loss yesterday certainly wasn’t on him.
I agree and for some reference this thread was made in 2019 so take that into account.It’s absurd to call Baker a bust, he’s a very good QB. He’s led the Bucs to two straight division titles and has played very well both years. I guarantee the Browns wish they had stuck with Baker instead of giving washed up Watson a huge deal. I like Baker and think he’ll continue to have success in Tampa - the loss yesterday certainly wasn’t on him.
Yeah people get way too impatient with QBs these days - everyone expects them to come out looking like Mahomes did when he started, or like Stroud did in his strong rookie season, and if they don’t people are quick to label them a bust. It’s totally absurd.I agree and for some reference this thread was made in 2019 so take that into account.
I don’t think he was a bust then either but people are impatient
Look at the Panthers right now. They had Sam Darnold, DJ Moore, Christian McCaffery, Chuba Hubbard, Curtis Samuel. Feels like thats more than enough foundation to work on as long as you figure out everything else. Instead they went chasing waterfalls and they have their franchise QB after two years but also the worst defense in footballI know. His opinion is a popular one, though.
At first glance his numbers look okay.
But according to profootball-ref.com he led the league in int's (16) and fumbles (12).
I remember him stiff arming Nick Bosa all the way from midfield to the sidelines and still tossing for a 13 yd 1st down. He won me over there.
And I like his rushing style, no slides.
You have to look at the overall return rather than individual stats or plays. I'd take 41 TDs, 16 INTs, and 12 fumbles every time over something like 25 TDs, 10 INTs, and 8 fumbles, (which would also be a very strong season).At first glance his numbers look okay.
But according to profootball-ref.com he led the league in int's (16) and fumbles (12).
Don't have many good things to say about him. Be he is a competitor.
Yep.It's interesting, this notion that teams should either have a top-ten QB or trash so they can try to draft one.