Right? He has said he didn't want Baker for a long time and he was essentially garbage. The thing is Baker is way better than Geno or Lock and it isn't close. This would be a good move-no risk for Seattle. It's a no-brainer
Could argue Lockett close to #2.
IF they want to win no doubt.....but I can understand wanting to tank and having no need for Baker.
Yeah, the best duo of receivers he's ever had.
My only disagreement here is the word "many".
I'd say just being willing to offer the picks the Browns did means those teams were very interested. would they have gone as far as the Browns did? Not sure, but guess is no.
I could see it since if he plays well it likely means he played them out of a top pick, though they would have ammo to move up.
Again - my issue was just with the word "many"...I think there were only 4 teams...that's 1/8 of the league - not many.
Might be wrong, but is this deal being 100% guaranteed a bit overblown? I mean, Mahomes' deal was pretty much the same deal (but he has 5 additional years that would not be guaranteed). Will say Mahomes body of work more deserving, of course, but he was also on a better team.
Fair enough...but those are only the teams we know offered enough for Houston to accept their offer and allow the meeting. Could have been more who were interested.
I don't think it is in this context because Watson initially told Cleveland: No.
Maybe, but I think there's a difference between 6-8 teams kicking the tires and 4 teams who were really interested enough to offer enough to be seriously considered.
No disagreement there, and in fact I was wrong. Thought Mahomes had a guarantee well over $200 mil. May "only" be 150 mil.
This.
I still don't want him and don't believe any trade happens with the Seahawks. However as long as any trade is dirt cheap no big deal.
He never had 17 games. He would almost certainly have hit 4K in 2018 and 2019 with 17 games - just needed 75 yds for the other three starts in 2018 and 175 in the last start in 2019.
