• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

If we are being honest about it, DeVonta Smith is going to establish himself as the best WR in the league within the next 3 years.

Sweetswingingsammysosa

Active Member
252
34
28
Joined
Aug 21, 2022
Location
USA
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Happy Cracking Up GIF by Regal


I nailed it. You're such a homer
You lose again, You made a false assumption that I believe Watson is better which I never ever stated that. Yes of course Watson has more potential as he's younger, more athletic, bigger, stronger, faster, smarter, etc etc. That doesn't mean he will be better but clearly has waaaaaay more potential than JJ.


Please reach some more this is fun.
 

Sweetswingingsammysosa

Active Member
252
34
28
Joined
Aug 21, 2022
Location
USA
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Sure, you believe he has more potential, close enough

Classic


alright, you're trolling is boring me
Ok, potential isn't the same as your original claim. Potential is something not yet realized and based off the metrics he clearly has more potential and I would say that if he was on any other team including the Vikes. It doesn't mean he will be better but he possibly could. That's not an outlandish statement at all. So apparently you don't know there's a major difference between potential to be better than and "better than". This is quite alarming and very sad.

Trolling? What, by giving you sound reasoning. Whatever helps you sleep at night little buddy.

If anything you're trolling by intentionally using strawman arguments to attempt to make it appear as though my previous statements are false due to some kind of perceived homerism. You failed to show that JJ beat JA on that play because it was zone defense as I told you so you resorted to calling me a troll and using strawman arguments. These are classic low IQ tactics I see used on these boards.

So the kids on here can only use name calling, saying I'm a troll or a homer because they cannot provide any evidence to refute any of my claims. Hopefully, there are much better posters on here with more integrity and ability than the few I've had discussions with in here. I am very dissapointed so far.
 

Sweetswingingsammysosa

Active Member
252
34
28
Joined
Aug 21, 2022
Location
USA
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
i'm guessing you think Watson is a better WR too
JJ's metrics 6'1" 202 lbs 3 years of experience in the NFL 4.43 40 time 37.5 inch vert 10'6" broad jump, athleticism score 82 Wonderlic score 19 (dumb as a box of rocks). Oh also an emotional baby when he gets beat on the field. Cries like a baby back bitch. Makes a thousand excuses and doesn't accept that he got his ass beat.

Watson's 208 lbs metrics : 1 year of experience in the NFL 6'4 4.36 40 time 38.5 inch vert 11'4" broad jump athleticism score 99 Wonderlic score of 38 which is higher than probably anyone else at his position and possibly higher than 95% of the NFL. Doesn't cry like a little girl if he has a poor game, he just comes back and learns from his mistakes and admits when he sucked.

So Watson is stronger, smarter, faster, bigger, controls his emotions, etc. Now there's other intangibles such as heart, creativity, work ethic, etc. But we can't really measure those and we go off what we see and hear from other people around the league.

So to suggest that Watson doesn't have the potential to be better than JJ is absolutely pure insanity. All the measurable metrics agree with Watson having more potential.
 

PnkPanther

Well-Known Member
43,559
13,068
1,033
Joined
Jul 25, 2016
Hoopla Cash
$ 253.18
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
JJ's metrics 6'1" 202 lbs 3 years of experience in the NFL 4.43 40 time 37.5 inch vert 10'6" broad jump, athleticism score 82 Wonderlic score 19 (dumb as a box of rocks). Oh also an emotional baby when he gets beat on the field. Cries like a baby back bitch. Makes a thousand excuses and doesn't accept that he got his ass beat.

Watson's 208 lbs metrics : 1 year of experience in the NFL 6'4 4.36 40 time 38.5 inch vert 11'4" broad jump athleticism score 99 Wonderlic score of 38 which is higher than probably anyone else at his position and possibly higher than 95% of the NFL. Doesn't cry like a little girl if he has a poor game, he just comes back and learns from his mistakes and admits when he sucked.

So Watson is stronger, smarter, faster, bigger, controls his emotions, etc. Now there's other intangibles such as heart, creativity, work ethic, etc. But we can't really measure those and we go off what we see and hear from other people around the league.

So to suggest that Watson doesn't have the potential to be better than JJ is absolutely pure insanity. All the measurable metrics agree with Watson having more potential.
Cracking Up Lol GIF by Rodney Dangerfield
 

bamagrad75

Not All Those Who Wander Are Lost
Moderator
34,794
23,734
1,033
Joined
Nov 30, 2018
Location
On a Reef Somewhere
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Try what? Show me what rule I broke. Show me the specific rules I didn't adhere to. If I didn't then leave me alone and don't restrict my free speech. I wouldn't want to restrict yours.

That is considered to be a racist word. You can read the rules here for yourself.
 

Mebert

Not Mebert's Alt
19,209
11,224
1,033
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Location
Salt Lake City
Hoopla Cash
$ 22,700.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
That is considered to be a racist word. You can read the rules here for yourself.
I am the last guy that wants to come to this dudes defense, but that word is not racist. It is often used by dumbasses because it sounds racist though.

My 2 cents, my other 2 cents are ban the fuck, he is garbage on this site.
 

bamagrad75

Not All Those Who Wander Are Lost
Moderator
34,794
23,734
1,033
Joined
Nov 30, 2018
Location
On a Reef Somewhere
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I am the last guy that wants to come to this dudes defense, but that word is not racist. It is often used by dumbasses because it sounds racist though.

My 2 cents, my other 2 cents are ban the fuck, he is garbage on this site.

Context also matters and it was transparent what he was trying to pull. A zillion other words would have sufficed.
 

Sweetswingingsammysosa

Active Member
252
34
28
Joined
Aug 21, 2022
Location
USA
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
That is considered to be a racist word. You can read the rules here for yourself.
There is no definition where that word is used as a racist word. If that's true please show me this racist definition. If you can show me this then I will agree. However, if you can't then I have the freedom to use this word as I please as it is not racist in any way. It's a homophone which I have full liberty to use.

No, the burden of proof is on you to show me the rules which I supposedly broke not me. You're the one threatening to stop me free speech I didn't threaten to stop your free speech and you're the one suggesting I broke the so called rules so you need to show me the rule I broke so I don't break that rule in the future. I was unable to find such rules stating we cannot use words that are homophone words (one at which is not racist but sounds similar to a word that is racist).
 

Mebert

Not Mebert's Alt
19,209
11,224
1,033
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Location
Salt Lake City
Hoopla Cash
$ 22,700.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
There is no definition where that word is used as a racist word. If that's true please show me this racist definition. If you can show me this then I will agree. However, if you can't then I have the freedom to use this word as I please as it is not racist in any way. It's a homophone which I have full liberty to use.

No, the burden of proof is on you to show me the rules which I supposedly broke not me. You're the one threatening to stop me free speech I didn't threaten to stop your free speech and you're the one suggesting I broke the so called rules so you need to show me the rule I broke so I don't break that rule in the future. I was unable to find such rules stating we cannot use words that are homophone words (one at which is not racist but sounds similar to a word that is racist).
Guaranteed the freedom to use the word, not a platform to do it on. I for one agree this is totally unjust, you should reuse the word in the next dozen or so posts to prove your point.
 

Sweetswingingsammysosa

Active Member
252
34
28
Joined
Aug 21, 2022
Location
USA
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Context also matters and it was transparent what he was trying to pull. A zillion other words would have sufficed.
There is no context in which that word is racist by definition. You can believe or feel it's racist but that doesn't change the current definitions of this specific word. We have a choice to use any word we desire within any context as long as they're not defined as racist. You will most likely need to change the rules in order to ban my free speech in this specific case. That would be quite sad if you go to those extremes. Also, the other guy said gay. If anything that's homophobic, yet I am the one being threatened. Very interesting, seems like we pick and chose who we want to speak and who we don't.

Again, I wouldn't restrict your free speech from using words that have no racist definition. Not sure why I am being attacked for doing nothing against the rules. Maybe I hold people to a higher moral standard.

I didn't call someone gay or say gay now did I?
 

Southieinnc

Do Your Job!
27,754
12,159
1,033
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Location
Out of the desert!
Hoopla Cash
$ 9,532.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Try what? Show me what rule I broke. Show me the specific rules I didn't adhere to. If I didn't then leave me alone and don't restrict my free speech. I wouldn't want to restrict yours.
I imagine there are more than a few people who would like to "restrict your free speach" in person!
Cowardly to play this game anonymously on an internet forum.
 

Mebert

Not Mebert's Alt
19,209
11,224
1,033
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Location
Salt Lake City
Hoopla Cash
$ 22,700.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
There is no context in which that word is racist by definition. You can believe or feel it's racist but that doesn't change the current definitions of this specific word. We have a choice to use any word we desire within any context as long as they're not defined as racist. You will most likely need to change the rules in order to ban my free speech in this specific case. That would be quite sad if you go to those extremes. Also, the other guy said gay. If anything that's homophobic, yet I am the one being threatened. Very interesting, seems like we pick and chose who we want to speak and who we don't.

Again, I wouldn't restrict your free speech from using words that have no racist definition. Not sure why I am being attacked for doing nothing against the rules. Maybe I hold people to a higher moral standard.

I didn't call someone gay or say gay now did I?
I am not shocked you don't understand how free speech works.
 
Top