- Thread starter
- #21
NBKLee
Head Idiot In Charge
totally agree with you. We need Bogut....can't replace big man inside
OT: I want to marry your Avatar, I'll promise to be faithful until something better comes along.
totally agree with you. We need Bogut....can't replace big man inside
An incentive-laden contract is interesting because if he hits them he'll be worth it. I don't understand how incentives work with respect to the cap and luxury tax though. Wouldn't you have to count the maximum possible incentive against the cap? Otherwise, why wouldn't teams pay someone a salary of $1 with a $15M "incentive" if they play 1 game (for example)?
There's also the potential problem of the incentives creating strife between the coach and player though. Let's say Bogut has a minor injury. Maybe Jackson and ownership wants to hold him out for a few games to make sure the minor injury doesn't turn into a major one. If this happens several times (as it has already with Bogut, Curry, and others), now the player may see coaching/ownership screwing him out of several million dollars, when he feels like he can play. I don't know, there are some traps there that might not be good for morale.
Well, I sort of agree with you. There are two problems though: there are certainly other teams who will offer 3 guaranteed years, and if you go 2 years, you'll have to pay more per year. And as I have said, I don't see not re-signing Bogut as a good option, in fact it's a very bad option because we would be very unlikely to be able to replace what he gives, even injured.And for the record, I would give Bogut two guaranteed years with a third, team-option year. I would not guarantee all three years with his health record.
The most amount of years Bogut can sign on an extension is 3 years. That being said if I'm the Warriors I give him two contract offers:
1) 3 year - 36M deal(12M annually). Fully guaranteed. No game incentives or opt out clauses for the Warriors based on games played by Bogut.
2) 3 year - 42M deal(14M annually). The deal would have an annual salary of 10M. If he plays 55 games, he gets a bonus of 2M. If he plays 65 games, he gets an additional 2M bonus. Total amount could average 14M a year.
Both deals have their pro's and con's. I think if we're able to get 65 games out of Bogut a year during the regular season, the Warriors could easily land a playoff spot and the contract would be well worth it.
Nailed it.
Bogut signs 3 year extension worth 36M. Could be pushed up to 42M with incentives.
Here's the story
FE, HB and Klay also had their options renewed for the '14 year.
3 years is probably a reasonable deal.
Wow, that is great news! $12M per is about the best I was hoping for, excellent deal. I didn't want to see this drag on into the season without resolution, glad they got it taken care of.
Well, we don't really have to worry about what might happen because NBA contracts cannot have a "games played" incentive. The only incentives that are allowed in contracts are for team goals or individual goals with specific numerical benchmarks (PPG or team wins) or most standard league awards (MVP, Finals MVP, Defensive Player of the Year, Sixth Man, Most Improved Player etc)
The NBA does not allow incentives based on the player being on the team's roster on a specific date or for a specific number of games.
Glad they re-signed him. Hope he can stay healthy. Can't remember the last good big man the Warriors had.
Marc Jackson?
Erik Stonehands Dampier?
Ronny Seikaly would probably be the closest thing since 1990.
I was thinking Robert Parrish
Unless your owners are prepared to possibly pay luxury tax for a couple years if need be, I think this is too much guaranteed money.
Unless your owners are prepared to possibly pay luxury tax for a couple years if need be, I think this is too much guaranteed money.