- Thread starter
- #21
HurricaneDij39
Movin' On Forward
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GioehkcsVT8]All 8 of Randy Foye's three pointers vs. The Nets 3-30-13 - YouTube[/ame]
LOL each one our nine best players is better than his team's second-best player.
I'd take Randy Foye on my team over Carlos Boozer any day at this point. Who wouldn't? Foye even plays defense.
Maybe someday we'll see Shaqdaddy make some actual analysis and not just some blanket statement as usual.
What amuses me is that you can't tell if i'm being serious or not. You're so content on trying to have the upper hand in all your posts that it clouds your rationale.
And i'll take Lin, Clarkson, Young and Randle over Lawson, Afflalo, Gallinari and Faried any day.![]()
I'm convinced you know nothing about ball after that last statement
Yup. He was being completely serious and now he's trying to cover it up. Funny stuff!
This has nothing to do with the Lakers. I was talking about your prior childish statements. Denver has wayyy more talent than Los Angeles though since you decided to bring it up. Most Lakers fans that actually know basketball would agree with me too.
It's clear to me that you don't follow the NBA, just the Lakers.
It's also quite clear you're basing a teams future on past performances.
I can come up with plenty of arguments why the lakers are a more talented, better team than the nuggets.
But how about you start by telling me why the nuggets are better. Seeing as you seem to know more about basketball than me.
I could sit here and write out a 2500 word essay in MLA format on why Denver is the better and more talented team than LA and you still wouldn't comprehend because you're a homer that knows nothing about the NBA.
Because if you actually followed the NBA you would know more about Denver's roster. I shouldn't have to explain anything to you.
Yet you have trouble with coming up with just one reason.
Guess someone's butthurt because the suns are in a pretty terrible position too. But I'm sure you know that spending the majority of your salary cap on three guards is a great move for the future.
But this isn't about the laughingstock team of the nba, so back to topic.
ONE reason why the nuggets are better than the lakers.
I'll give you two.
More talent. More depth.
Adding Afflalo and Harris at SG will help and Gallo's return is huge. He was one of the up and coming young SF's in the game prior to his injury. You're baking on a 36 year old Kobe to carry the load. If he's healthy, great. You guys will still struggle to compete in the West. If not, you're looking at the 14-15 seed.
Nuggs have depth at each position.
McGee-Mozgov
Faried-Hickson
Gallo-W.Chandler
Afflalo-Harris
Lawson-Nate Rob
Anything else?
Terrible, try again.
The lakers added two extremely talented rookies and gained strength and youth in both the PF and PG position.
And Afflalo is a non factor.
Nash and Lin are better than Lawson and Robinson
Kobe and Young are better than Afflalo and Harris
And Boozer and Randle and better than Faried and Hickson
That's 3 out of the 5 positions.
Wow, two rookies that haven't proven anything, a one year wonder and a 36 year old coming off a serious injury! What a strong season it should be.... oh wait I forgot about the 32 year old Carlos Boozer who will surely carry the load.
Stopped reading after I saw you say Nash and Lin are better than Lawson and Robinson.
Afflalo a non-factor? If he came to the Lakers you'd say he's the next Kobe. Good god, get a grip. Your bball IQ is HORRIFIC.![]()
How drunk are you right now? Surely even you can't believe the BS you're coming up.
And you're questioning my bball IQ :rollseyes:
Please try again. That was pathetic.