- Thread starter
- #21
StanMarsh51
Well-Known Member
He was a good pitcher, but I would dare to disagree. IMO, his .518 win % is kind of weak, as was his 4.22 e.r.a. And, he gave up a ton of homers.
However, the guys who use these new fangled metrics probably have something where they can compensate for his pitching in the homer dome, so......?
For Radke's career, (1995-2006), the AL starting pitcher ERA was 4.80 and WHIP was 1.43, compared to Radke's 4.22 ERA and 1.23 WHIP, and that's before taking into account ballpark factors and that he averaged over 200 innings/season for his career. So his ERA is certainly better than it looks on the surface because of him pitching right in the middle of the 'steroid era.'
And regarding the record, you can definitely argue lack of run support hurt him (Twins were never known for their offense). In seasons like 1999 and 2004, he finished top 5 in ERA, but couldn't win 13 games in either of those seasons (while making 33+ starts in each). In 2000, he led the AL in losses despite having an above average ERA.
I'd argue he's underrated.