DChero
Out of Work Superhero
I'm totally hoping that OV and JT evenly split votes. Essentially anyone that believes that Crosby just didn't play enough games votes for one of them. If they believe that Crosby did, I think it goes to Sid.
Getzlaf got overlooked in all of this (understandly so as he does play on the west coast and half the sportswriters haven't seen him play this year). If you look at his stats, he had a very impressive season in all facets of the game.
I think you're risking brining out the haters by putting this out there.
No way Getzy would ever get considered by anyone who doesn't live in the PT time zone.
It's a wonder Perry even won it a few years back.
Surprise, surprise.... the hockey writer's chose 3 players from the Eastern Conference in the ET time zone.
And yet they say there's no east coast bias. Try living on the West Coast and you'd understand what an east coast bias was.
I think you're risking brining out the haters by putting this out there.
No way Getzy would ever get considered by anyone who doesn't live in the PT time zone.
It's a wonder Perry even won it a few years back.
Surprise, surprise.... the hockey writer's chose 3 players from the Eastern Conference in the ET time zone.
And yet they say there's no east coast bias. Try living on the West Coast and you'd understand what an east coast bias was.
would have liked for St.Louis to get it,but based on pure dominance for the amount of games played,Crosby should take it.
St. Louis & Stamkos finished 1st & 3rd in the scoring race & their team FAILED to make the playoffs. Sorry, but making the playoffs are a must. Yzerman needs to focus on puttiing a better TEAM on the ice. Bishop better be the answer because Conacher is kicking butt.
St. Louis & Stamkos finished 1st & 3rd in the scoring race & their team FAILED to make the playoffs. Sorry, but making the playoffs are a must. Yzerman needs to focus on puttiing a better TEAM on the ice. Bishop better be the answer because Conacher is kicking butt.
I think the compressed schedule (no inter-conference play) played a big factor in that all three finalists come from the Eastern Conference. The Eastern-based writers just didn't see enough of the guys playing out west.
pretty small sample size as i was only in SF for a year, but based on that year and that location, there's a reason there's an east coast bias. i've never been in an area that had fewer sports fans.
and that becomes a measure for determining who is deserving of a nomination as MVP of a team?
heck, if a player comes from a team that only gets 200 people a night to show up at their building, but is one of the best players in the league, he should get recognition. it shouldn't be "oh well, no one in that area cares about sports so there's no need for him to get recognition"
of course not, i was just providing a reason for east coast bias.
these awards are really just a publicity stunt to get people talking about hockey. it's much more effective where sports have a bigger following. i put very little stock in them. the games and the awards players vote on are what really matter.
agreed. sorry to jump down your throat there. i just hate the east coast bias thing. but i'm a west coast girl, so i guess it's natural since i always feel like my guys get slighted.
but i definitely agree on the publicity stunt. player voted awards are much better