deanpet21
Well-Known Member
Grant Paulsen said today on his pod that the new uniforms will resemble the old ones. The shade of burgundy will be the same as the old, but no logo.
So, the "w" is staying on the helmet?
Grant Paulsen said today on his pod that the new uniforms will resemble the old ones. The shade of burgundy will be the same as the old, but no logo.
I think the logo should at least be the commander who wiped out the Redskins then and I don’t mean Fred SmithSo, the "w" is staying on the helmet?
Agreed, if it''s going to be Commanders lets change the name to those Unon (US) Commanders who slaughtered the Indians and forced them onto reservations. How about George Custer. We can change the name to Trail of Tears and Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee. Now that is something to be proud of.I think the logo should at least be the commander who wiped out the Redskins then and I don’t mean Fred Smith
I think we should protest, right?Agreed, if it''s going to be Commanders lets change the name to those Unon (US) Commanders who slaughtered the Indians and forced them onto reservations. How about George Custer. We can change the name to Trail of Tears and Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee. Now that is something to be proud of.
Nothing definitve on that but I'm pretty sure. If I had to guess based off of what's been reported by Bram and Grant, I'd say we get the 91 uniforms and the helmet has a W with the white and gold stripes on the top.So, the "w" is staying on the helmet?
For me it was very simple. 12-5 and a trip to the NFC Championship Game with the most exciting young player in the entire league made a name I didn't much care for a lot more tollerable. I'm getting use to it and the entire name thing has become exhausting. I want the team to spend their time and energy on more important things. Things that really matter to winning.
I along with many others will never embrace the name. How the hell could you.
A very puzzling post sir! So there's no confusion on my part is it your position that the old name is honorable, except when you don't like the change and because of that you want to demonstrate how dishonorable it was by reminding everyone of their destruction?I think the logo should at least be the commander who wiped out the Redskins then and I don’t mean Fred Smith
Instead of complaining, don’t buy Commanders merchandise. If it costs them money, they will change.
Let's hope not! That "W" is more symbolic of Rivera's coaching style (weak) than the city it supposedly represents!
Ok, change your last name. See how you like it. That's what I liken it too. The name was forcibly changed to appease others and should have never happened. You will NEVER see the BLACKHAWKS change their name. I grew up a diehard Redskin fan, and you change the name?For me it was very simple. 12-5 and a trip to the NFC Championship Game with the most exciting young player in the entire league made a name I didn't much care for a lot more tollerable. I'm getting use to it and the entire name thing has become exhausting. I want the team to spend their time and energy on more important things. Things that really matter to winning.
I can understand some of you old guard dudes hating the name change. I will always laugh at you for believing it's that important but you certainly have that right. But not sure you have the right to ask other fans how they could embrace the new name.
It also hurts the players pockets as well. No REAL Redskin fan is going to buy a Commander jersey will they? I sure wouldn't. Sorry Daniels but I am not buying one because of the name on it.Instead of complaining, don’t buy Commanders merchandise. If it costs them money, they will change.
I guess I'm not a real Redskins fan, because as soon as they switch back to the 91 threads, I'm going shopping.It also hurts the players pockets as well. No REAL Redskin fan is going to buy a Commander jersey will they? I sure wouldn't. Sorry Daniels but I am not buying one because of the name on it.