Is Couturier as a 2C and Laughton as a 3C REALLY good enough to win a Cup? Couturier hasn't shown more than 3rd line ability and Laughton has yet to show he's more than a 4th line player.
I think Coots is a 2C in this league when all is said and done. He's elite defensively and I think you stick him with decent linemates for a while, and maybe not start him in the defensive zone all the time against the other team's best lines, and he can contribute offensively. He's only a little bit behind 20 goal pace this season playing some of the hardest minutes in the entire league, with RJ Umberger and the remnants of Matt Read. He's doing most of that even strength too. If the Flyers ever put together a decent 2nd PP unit his numbers would balloon even more.
Berube claimed he was going to set Couturier up to be more of an offensive threat this year and to this point, he's done the exact opposite. His usage has been even more difficult this year.
IMO Laughton shouldn't be in the NHL right now, but I have faith he becomes a good 3rd line center. He's got the speed and tenacity. Centering Schenn and Simmonds has been a black hole for everyone that has tried. It blows my mind that they continue to play on the same line. Briere couldn't do it. Vinny couldn't do it. It didn't work with Schenn at C and Vinny on the wing, and it doesn't work with Laughton. At some point, someone in charge has gotta realize it's probably Schenn/Simmonds not the center. Vinny has done fine with freakin Bellemare and VV.