mattola
Scotchy Scotch Scotch!
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't see how Columbus is that much further than the Flyers as far as winning - I consider them equal when you look at the young talent on both teams
Something is up
I know he had to waive his NMC to go to CBus, and I do think it's a good place for him to go to, but I'd agree they're likely on a similar tier in regard to winning. CBus is a young "up and coming" type of team, Philly a bit older I guess. Hartnell could be a great leader in that room. Of course with the epitome of leadership, grit, and HOCKEY Dubinsky, it's not like they really need it, right?
Flyers have an older defense(actually CBJ and PHI have similar type defenses, except CBJ has Ryan Murray) but I don't think the Flyers are that old, the forwards are still really young
Scott Hartnell will give CBJ leadership and I'm sure he'll help them a little bit offensively, but the Flyers basically traded a 5 year contract for a 3 year contract, so those two extra years they won't have to pay for, which is important going forward - you don't want to be stuck with a player who possibly could be declining at a point where that player might cost you a chance to get the one piece you need to get over the top
I didn't mean that Philly was old, just older overall than Columbus. I understand the contract idea, but generally speaking the best player in a trade is how one determines a "winner". Still a pretty expensive fourth liner for 3 years. I fully expect that Hartnell will be just as valuable as Umberger is now in 3 years, so Columbus will deal with an expensive fourth liner, but for a team that I know is competitive now, it's puzzling in the short term. They're going to need to move Vinny or Umberger again this offseason, IMO. That's a ton of money for guys who are depth.
I think Hextall is going to rearrange the Flyers to get the bad contracts dealt with and to implement his training to build a winner. We were in the hunt but not anywhere close to the top tier teams yet. I also think that Hextall is not done.
I didn't mean that Philly was old, just older overall than Columbus. I understand the contract idea, but generally speaking the best player in a trade is how one determines a "winner". Still a pretty expensive fourth liner for 3 years. I fully expect that Hartnell will be just as valuable as Umberger is now in 3 years, so Columbus will deal with an expensive fourth liner, but for a team that I know is competitive now, it's puzzling in the short term. They're going to need to move Vinny or Umberger again this offseason, IMO. That's a ton of money for guys who are depth.
Cool. David Clarkson for Mike Carman then? It's a big win for you guys!
Generally when moving bad deals I tend to believe that the team that gets the shorter deal usually wins. It's a principle that Nonis obviously didn't understand when he traded Liles for Gleason.
I included "generally speaking" so as to not include every deal. I guess I just think Hartnell has significant value left...and Umberger not so much. Umberger can still play in the NHL, but his role is limited. Just a lot of money for that. Both have similar cap hits, but one provides a lot more. So yes, those 2 extra years are the reason Philly likely traded him, I just found it a bit surprising, because I felt he was still a big part of their team still. I guess my great point is this: for the next 3 years it's very likely that Columbus wins this trade.