poprocksncoke
Well-Known Member
yeah, was a rush decision and I blew it. lolas a Raider fan, you should've known to grab Moreau
Still up by 10 and person im going against has NO DEF
yeah, was a rush decision and I blew it. lolas a Raider fan, you should've known to grab Moreau
That might be a good thing. I had the Bengals D yesterday and decided to change it to the Jets. Not my best move of the year.yeah, was a rush decision and I blew it. lol
Still up by 10 and person im going against has NO DEF
Picked up Giants DEF for last week, was all that was left. Someone dropped NE so I picked them up Sunday morning, regretting that.That might be a good thing. I had the Bengals D yesterday and decided to change it to the Jets. Not my best move of the year.
That might be a good thing. I had the Bengals D yesterday and decided to change it to the Jets. Not my best move of the year.
Picked up Giants DEF for last week, was all that was left. Someone dropped NE so I picked them up Sunday morning, regretting that.
they didnt do bad but Giants would have got me 10 more points.
My complaint this week is on Michael Pittman and the colts... I lost because of that last minute 25 yard TD... it would be one thing if it was necessary, but it wasnt... you had the win in the bag, and decided to throw the ball... the decision made no sense as a football decision... if you were passing to get a first down to control more of the clock that is one thing, but why score a TD??
luckily, this is the league i am doing worst in, and have very little chance to make it to the playoffs... so i dont care that much... But it would have been nice to get that win...
Was Hedecke Smith on the coaching staff?My complaint this week is on Michael Pittman and the colts... I lost because of that last minute 25 yard TD... it would be one thing if it was necessary, but it wasnt... you had the win in the bag, and decided to throw the ball... the decision made no sense as a football decision... if you were passing to get a first down to control more of the clock that is one thing, but why score a TD??
luckily, this is the league i am doing worst in, and have very little chance to make it to the playoffs... so i dont care that much... But it would have been nice to get that win...
Well, for fourth down in general (not fourth and inches), it's just a routine stop, so not as big a football play as forcing a fumble or getting an interception. And if they get the first down, that hurts the DST, so there's a built-in benefit to stopping them. Maybe 1 point for a turnover on downs?My complaint: Can somebody explain to me why a team D/ST doesn't get points for a turnover on downs? I've never understood why there aren't points for that. There has to be a way to differentiate between whether a team punts to turn the ball over or goes for it and gets stopped. It seems to me like this should be worth 2 points just like every other turnover is.
Better numbers than waller every game but 2 this year!
Waller has played 6 games.He's only played 4 games this year, hard to see your logic.
Yeah but you still get two points for a garbage time hail mary interception or if the other team does the stupid hundred laterals play and you fall on the fumble at the end of the game. I'd argue that a stop on fourth down is sometimes even more valuable especially in the red zone when you are directly taking points off the scoreboard for the other team.Well, for fourth down in general (not fourth and inches), it's just a routine stop, so not as big a football play as forcing a fumble or getting an interception. And if they get the first down, that hurts the DST, so there's a built-in benefit to stopping them. Maybe 1 point for a turnover on downs?
I'm scared to use Barkley and IDK if those WRs do any better, would consider Claypool as a coin toss and likely use Lockett over LandryDo I give Tyler Lockett one more week to redeem himself or bench him this week? I just can't take it anymore, he isn't the same player without Wilson...
I have him in 2 leagues:
options:
1st league - Claypool or Barkley (might not go)
2nd - Landry
Id bench him. He started hit this year, but even look at locket last year. He had most of his fantasy points in what 2-3 games and was a major liability the other weeks. Id wait on word for barkley, if not take claypool. he hasnt been as efficient but hes gonna get 8+ targetsDo I give Tyler Lockett one more week to redeem himself or bench him this week? I just can't take it anymore, he isn't the same player without Wilson...
I have him in 2 leagues:
options:
1st league - Claypool or Barkley (might not go)
2nd - Landry
No one in Seattle is the same without RW.Do I give Tyler Lockett one more week to redeem himself or bench him this week? I just can't take it anymore, he isn't the same player without Wilson...
I have him in 2 leagues:
options:
1st league - Claypool or Barkley (might not go)
2nd - Landry
Denzel Ward is out for CLE...idk toughI'm scared to use Barkley and IDK if those WRs do any better, would consider Claypool as a coin toss and likely use Lockett over Landry
I'm not sure what expert said it but they said Lockett would be a disappointment this year. I'm not sure if it was BerryId bench him. He started hit this year, but even look at locket last year. He had most of his fantasy points in what 2-3 games and was a major liability the other weeks. Id wait on word for barkley, if not take claypool. he hasnt been as efficient but hes gonna get 8+ targets
Yeah I think Barkley is doubtful. I don't see him playing but Landry is intriguing especially with Baker back.P
No one in Seattle is the same without RW.
I'd bench him for Landry. Definitely for Barkley if he plays. Probably not for Clypool though, but it's close