Warden
Active Member
It is a numbers game, you are going to keep 25 offensive players 25 defensive players and 3 special teams players. Of the 25 offensive players that you keep at least 9 of them are going to be OL and you want to keep 3 TEs so that leaves 13 spots for 3 positions. If we keep 6 WRs which I think we do, then it will be 5RBs and 2 QBs or 4 RBs and 3 QBs. It is possible that we keep only 5 WRs but who would we expose for another team to pick up. I highly doubt we sacrifice a defensive position for a 3rd QB
Seattle is in a position where they really do not need a developmental QB. We have a very gifted young QB in Russell Wilson. We pretty much know who our starter is going to be for the next decade. What we need is A QB who could come in and win us some games if Russell was to go down for 3 or 4 games. I have a much higher comfort level having TJac do this over Pryor
IMO, Pryor will be competing with Ware for a roster spot
Seattle is in a position where they really do not need a developmental QB. We have a very gifted young QB in Russell Wilson. We pretty much know who our starter is going to be for the next decade. What we need is A QB who could come in and win us some games if Russell was to go down for 3 or 4 games. I have a much higher comfort level having TJac do this over Pryor
IMO, Pryor will be competing with Ware for a roster spot