You are trying to throw out the most probably subset, teams that lost after losing the first 2 at home. I invite you to show your work and give a percentage.
Oh no, you simply have no logic on this. You are trying to act like it’s easier if you lost the first 2 at home. No.
0.3 percent is the correct answer for teams that came back to win a series after losing the first 2 at home. Now that is of the total teams that were down 0-2. What he is trying to say is that 5 of the 27 that overcame the odds of 27/312 did so after losing the first 2 at home. He would be correct if he were saying that about 25 percent of teams that overcame 0-2 did so after losing the first 2 at home. He’s not seeing it though.
Yeah I was being sarcastic and I don’t really give a fuck.
Nor do I but I’m not wrong about this. I expect in his head he thinks he is right but he is doing a poor job of explaining. I will bet it all, I’m right.
Oh so you aren’t right about any of it then lol. Got it.
You can’t disprove what I’m saying. 27/312 (your numbers) is the percentage that overcame 0-2. 5/27 is the number that successfully did it after losing first 2 at home. 5/27 times 27/312 is the mathematically correct nimber.
This is the best version of a Tatum/Brown-led Celtics team that has been put together... but it still has all the same problems that have plagued this version of the Celtics. Even with Tatum and Brown being smack in the middle of their prime years... (they're not kids anymore)... even with a bevy of veterans surrounding them...
- Boston can't consistently beat a zone defense
- Boston can't consistently execute in the clutch
I have to say, though... Jimmy Butler is a marvel. I can't help but admire him even as he's killing my team. The combination of confidence, competitiveness, leadership and joy that he brings to the basketball court is amazing.
Anywho... unless the Celtics are winning by 20+ points with any less than 5 minutes to go in a game, I wouldn't bet money on them earning the W.
I don’t give a fuck. I’m the third party now who is just telling everybody that I don’t give a fuck. I would like for both of you to continue to lobby me so I can continue to play my role as the zero fucks to give guy.
Oh it most certainly is. The only way you are right is if you are talking about something different entirely, and if you are you are doing a poor job of explaining it.
Personally, I thought in game 2 that Time Lord looked better in his minutes vs the zone than Horford did.
No believe me I never had you pegged as a math guy in any way.
This isn’t differential calculus. It’s simple percentage math. Let’s not pretend that you guys are out here building bridges.
