TurnUpTheHeat
Well-Known Member
Up 4...I'll take it
Should be 6.
How could that last play not be reviewed?
The guy not starting the clock shouldn't be a reward for the home team.
Up 4...I'll take it
Please tell me your joking.
my son is in kindergarten... i have told him numerous times that i am a gangsta rapper and cage fighter and that's why i have to go to work. he told his teacher. my wife was actually upset.. i thought it was funny as hell.
Not at all.
He didn't swat at the inbound pass.
He palmed it.
You can't palm a ball and release it in less than .01.
Physically impossible.
No way that basket should count.
Slow motion clearly showed the ball was in his hand for more than .01.
Should be 6.
How could that last play not be reviewed?
The guy not starting the clock shouldn't be a reward for the home team.
it should be 4.. t
hey let the smallest dude on the court get a tip in.
Couple of the new words that you don't want your kids to learn?
When my daughter was learning to talk, one of the first phrases she picked up was "Fucking Lakers"!! She happened to be learning to talk when they were having a down year. That was a fun one to explain to the wife and Mother-In-Law.
Yet you can clearly see he's not touching the ball when the red light goes on. You do understand the difference between slow motion and live speed, right?
I understand what .01 is.
A person not starting a clock doesn't mean time stood still.
Somebody post the video.
The fact that the light went off that much after the basket only further proves the clock wasn't even close to being started at the correct time.
You tell me how his hand can go on the ball and off the ball in less than .01 unless it is a swat.
And to be clear....if the Heat lose by 1, the call didn't cost them the game.
I'm just saying IMO it was clearly a bad call.
I thought it was a pretty sweet play. Is it really worth getting all bent trying to explain the physics of why it shouldn't have been possible? Chill dude!