Dirk
Member
I wonder if there is a "targets/game" metric on them. That is another huge factor. Shut down corners eventually stop getting tested and therefore stop racking up picks and defensed passes. It's still a badge of effectiveness. In fact, the best metaphor for this IS DEVIN HESTER as a kick returner. Even when he wasn't returning kicks for TDs, his effectiveness was felt by the offense starting at the 35 or 40 yard line because teams were kicking the ball out of bounds.
I have a theory on "impact players". My theory is there are four different kinds: imbalancers (guys who need to be double teamed every down and turn it into a 11 on 10 game), erasers (guys who can flat out erase an opposing player or a large section of the field), and playmakers (guys who turn picks into pick sixes, or four yard gains into 80 yard TDs, or always execute the perfect pass in the last 2 minutes of a game). Deion was an "eraser"... maybe one of the best at his position ever. Daryl Green? Maybe. Peanut I'd say was a "playmaker" CB... and a dynamite one at that. Dieon was a playmaker as well when the balls were being thrown to him and as a returner. I still think he's a legit GOAT candidate at his position.
My problem with Sanders as the GOAT corner is his massive allergy to tackling. The only problem with that is, he used his strengths to mitigate that weakness VERY VERY well. Everyone in the league knew he didn't want to tackle anyone, yet they still didn't want to test him that much because he could still make you look stupid doing it.
I guess in short I don't want to label him that, but have a damned hard time coming up with reasons not to.