If JV goes, does Kate stay?If the Tigers want to move Verlander without paying a huge portion of his salary, it will likely have to be for no better than mid-level prospects. In other words, a pure salary dump.
Well, Peter Gammons is now reporting that the Cubs are NOT interested in Verlander, but have instead inquired about Fulmer and Norris.
The main reason the Tigers want to sell is to get under the luxury cap next year and get younger. Trading away Fulmer and/or Norris accomplishes neither of those goals. And I would think Fulmer is maybe the only untouchable player on the Tigers as far as trade bait.
If the Tigers want to move Verlander without paying a huge portion of his salary, it will likely have to be for no better than mid-level prospects. In other words, a pure salary dump.
Well, Peter Gammons is now reporting that the Cubs are NOT interested in Verlander, but have instead inquired about Fulmer and Norris.
The main reason the Tigers want to sell is to get under the luxury cap next year and get younger. Trading away Fulmer and/or Norris accomplishes neither of those goals. And I would think Fulmer is maybe the only untouchable player on the Tigers as far as trade bait.
If the Tigers want to move Verlander without paying a huge portion of his salary, it will likely have to be for no better than mid-level prospects. In other words, a pure salary dump.
My first reaction to interest in Fulmer was, hell fucking no! But listening to Valenti today, he brought up a good angle. Let's say you can trade Fulmer and JV in return for 3 of their top prospects plus another B level prospect. And when I say top prospects I mean 3 of the top 5 including their #1 prospect. And you unload the JV contract (maybe retain $5 mil a year). I'm not saying they would go for that but if I'm moving Fulmer, it's got to be that type of deal, which can accelerate the rebuild and trim payroll at the same time.
But hooking together Fulmer and Verlander in a trade reduces the return value of what you would get for Fulmer in a straight up trade for him. Verlander, would drag Fulmer's value down. Wouldn't it be smarter to dump Verlander's salary (or as much of it as you can) and then r*pe some team's minor league prospects by trading Fulmer?
I'd trade Fulmer for Schwarber, Happ and Eloy Jiminez. Or JV and Fulmer for Scwarber, Happ,, Jiminez and De La Cruz and they can throw in a shit contract as well like Jason Heyward or something.My first reaction to interest in Fulmer was, hell fucking no! But listening to Valenti today, he brought up a good angle. Let's say you can trade Fulmer and JV in return for 3 of their top prospects plus another B level prospect. And when I say top prospects I mean 3 of the top 5 including their #1 prospect. And you unload the JV contract (maybe retain $5 mil a year). I'm not saying they would go for that but if I'm moving Fulmer, it's got to be that type of deal, which can accelerate the rebuild and trim payroll at the same time.
Schwarber would be an awful add.I'd trade Fulmer for Schwarber, Happ and Eloy Jiminez. Or JV and Fulmer for Scwarber, Happ,, Jiminez and De La Cruz and they can throw in a shit contract as well like Jason Heyward or something.
Schwarber has massive upside from the left side of the plate though. In my scenario, you get two outfielders anyways.Schwarber would be an awful add.
Him and NickyC is just too much for any staff to handle.
I'd trade Fulmer for Schwarber, Happ and Eloy Jiminez. Or JV and Fulmer for Scwarber, Happ,, Jiminez and De La Cruz and they can throw in a shit contract as well like Jason Heyward or something.
He can't play in the field.Schwarber has massive upside from the left side of the plate though. In my scenario, you get two outfielders anyways.
I'd have no issue packaging JV, Norris and Avila together. Do not want to part with Fulmer.
I'd be shocked if Machado isn't in next years opening day starting lineup. He's been rotting on the bench all year. Gotta be a reason.Cubs are possibly looking to trade 2b/ss Javier Baez. Might be a replacement for Kinsler or iglesias if Tigers care to trade them now or during the winter. I wonder if Chicago might part with Ben Zobrist, who is having a poor season, in order to balance some of the money they would pick up adding Verlander to their club? I looked at Cub's prospects...the good ones are a couple years away from the majors.