NEhomer
Well-Known Member
Yes.
Guilty before proven innocent taking a quote that is used time and time again by @chf start at your conclusion and work foreward.
Or, you can look at the facts and draw a logical conclusion.
Which facts would those be?
For example?
What's the point? There is literally nothing you'd believe. You'll come up with some contrived explanation for all of it. Deflator. Taking the balls to the bathroom. Smashing phones. None of it will matter to you.
Deflator. No idea, we don't have the context of the conversation, therefore anything regarding it is purely speculation.
Balls into the bathroom. It's possible he actually went to the bathroom.
The destruction of the phone while bad optics isn't relevant since the Wells teams specifically said they wouldn't be needing it, and that they already had all that they wanted in regards to it, ie text messages. There is nothing on that phone relevant to this case they didn't already have, according to Wells.
What we do have, and can prove, is that the balls delfated exactly as they should have according to the IGL.
You are simply pinning your wishes for it to be true upon speculation and false information, and ignoring provable scientific evidence.
If it were a criminal case it would be tossed in the first day.
"Actually, Pats fans aren't that bad when you factor out NEPatsfan." - The Hoop
It's not a criminal case, although people are convicted every day based on circumstantial evidence less compelling than the evidence here. You can try to explain away every detail, or you can look at the most logical conclusion.
You need to relax, you're coming off as a grade-A faggot in this thread.
When's Ben turning his phone over? What do you think is a fair amount of fines, loss of draft picks, and suspension, for Ben and the Steelers?
Or are you simply a hypocrite?
Ben's turning in his phone when you stop being a raging faggot. Soooo, hopefully soon, I guess?
NE why did one of the Pat's equipment guys get nicknamed the Deflator?
Maybe because he was the guy that was in charge of making sure the balls were not overinflated (as had ticked Brady off in a Jets game)??!? If you're the guy that Brady hounds all the time about making sure balls are not overinflated, you would probably give yourself that nickname, too. It's not nefarious or sneaky. It's haters looking to confirm their bias.