• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Dalton to start, idiots rejoice!

BearsWillWin

Well-Known Member
4,396
957
113
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Location
Nashville, TN
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Let’s just pretend like the Bears would have lost to the Giants Sunday had Fields been healthy and played and the Bears would have beat the Steelers had Dalton played.

Because that’s logical.
 

beardown07

Upstanding Member
69,902
19,576
1,033
Joined
Apr 9, 2011
Location
Pinacoladaberg
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Please explain how wins are just a QB stat.

I’ll wait.
You sound like BS right now. Wanting to play semantics games.


It's a team game...that's right. In fact, the exact same team played in front of two different QBs.

Which team had a way better win percentage?
 

beardown07

Upstanding Member
69,902
19,576
1,033
Joined
Apr 9, 2011
Location
Pinacoladaberg
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Let’s just pretend like the Bears would have lost to the Giants Sunday had Fields been healthy and played and the Bears would have beat the Steelers had Dalton played.

Because that’s logical.
You're reaching.
 

beardown07

Upstanding Member
69,902
19,576
1,033
Joined
Apr 9, 2011
Location
Pinacoladaberg
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
It's funny, cuz it's almost as if you think that I think, that Dalton should've started last week, even IF Fields were healthy.
 

BearsWillWin

Well-Known Member
4,396
957
113
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Location
Nashville, TN
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
You sound like BS right now. Wanting to play semantics games.


It's a team game...that's right. In fact, the exact same team played in front of two different QBs.

Which team had a way better win percentage?

It’s not semantics. At all.

Fields played well against the Steelers and Vikings but lost.

Dalton played like ass against the Lions and Giants but won.

Your logic says that means Dalton is better. Because you’re retarded.
 

NCChiFan

Argumentum artifex
19,197
6,565
533
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
One difference, major difference in the Giants game, Giraffe Neck. Terrible QB... Hard to believe he regressed that much from being a Bear QB.
 

BearsWillWin

Well-Known Member
4,396
957
113
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Location
Nashville, TN
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
One difference, major difference in the Giants game, Giraffe Neck. Terrible QB... Hard to believe he regressed that much from being a Bear QB.

Gotta be one of the absolute worst QB performances in the history of the game. No hyperbole.
 

BsGenius

Well-Known Member
3,306
377
83
Joined
Jan 4, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Please explain how wins are just a QB stat.

I’ll wait.

Indy tanking to get Andrew Luck wasn't smart because Luck never won the Super Bowl (your logic)

But

Wins are not just a QB stat?

Contradict much grey pubes?
 

BearsWillWin

Well-Known Member
4,396
957
113
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Location
Nashville, TN
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Indy tanking to get Andrew Luck wasn't smart because Luck never won the Super Bowl (your logic)

But

Wins are not just a QB stat?

Contradict much grey pubes?

How the hell is that a contradiction?

The Bears trading for Cutler was a failure as well because it didn’t lead to sustained winning. That doesn’t mean wins are a QB stat.

You make big moves to get wins. But wins are a team stat. Both can be true. Not a contradiction.
 

BsGenius

Well-Known Member
3,306
377
83
Joined
Jan 4, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
How the hell is that a contradiction?

The Bears trading for Cutler was a failure as well because it didn’t lead to sustained winning. That doesn’t mean wins are a QB stat.

You make big moves to get wins. But wins are a team stat. Both can be true. Not a contradiction.

You're really comparing Luck to Cutler? Try to follow.

If intentionally tanking to get Luck was a bad move because the Colts didn't win the super bowl, how can you judge Luck's acquisition (of being a bad move) be based on a team statistic of winning?

Hello dumb dumb? You can't have it both ways. I won't repeat it again.
 

BearsWillWin

Well-Known Member
4,396
957
113
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Location
Nashville, TN
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
You're really comparing Luck to Cutler? Try to follow.

If intentionally tanking to get Luck was a bad move because the Colts didn't win the super bowl, how can you judge Luck's acquisition (of being a bad move) be based on a team statistic of winning?

Hello dumb dumb? You can't have it both ways. I won't repeat it again.

If the point of playing football isn’t to win…then what is it?

Acquiring Luck wasn’t a bad move. I never typed those words. I said tanking is a bad move and using Luck as an example of tanking working, which you did, is dumb because they didn’t win a trophy with him. Notice I’m putting the onus on the team, not on Luck. Because wins are a team stat.

All team acquisitions…players, coaches, and front office….are judged on winning.

Repeat it. Don’t repeat it. Do you think anyone gives a shit?

Let me just say what everyone already knows….holy fucking shit you’re stupid.
 

BearsWillWin

Well-Known Member
4,396
957
113
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Location
Nashville, TN
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
It’s honestly like you saw how dumb beardown was in this thread and you said wait, hold my drool cup, I can one up this absolute retardation.

Either of you fucks have kids? If you don’t could you do the future a favor and get sterilized?
 

BsGenius

Well-Known Member
3,306
377
83
Joined
Jan 4, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Acquiring Luck wasn’t a bad move. I never typed those words. I said tanking is a bad move and using Luck as an example of tanking working, which you did, is dumb because they didn’t win a trophy with him. Notice I’m putting the onus on the team, not on Luck. Because wins are a team stat.

Are you seriously this dumb? What did i write that confuses you this much?

I never said tanking = winning dumb dumb. Please find me that link bitch.

The purpose of Indy tanking was to land Luck, and it worked! WTF. The team not winning with Luck had absolutely nothing to do with the already successful strategy of trying to land Luck dummy.

So fucking stupid.

It’s honestly like you saw how dumb beardown was in this thread and you said wait, hold my drool cup, I can one up this absolute retardation.

Either of you fucks have kids? If you don’t could you do the future a favor and get sterilized?

Holy shit the old geezer is raging mad. Settle down clown, i know covid got you scared again. Stay under the bed.
 

BearsWillWin

Well-Known Member
4,396
957
113
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Location
Nashville, TN
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
The team not winning with Luck had absolutely nothing to do with the already successful strategy of trying to land Luck dummy

Lol….you don’t even know what you’re saying. A for effort though.
 

BsGenius

Well-Known Member
3,306
377
83
Joined
Jan 4, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Lol….you don’t even know what you’re saying. A for effort though.

Ahhh finally the dunce cap sees the contradiction. Stupid ass. Derp.
 
Top