CS: Definitive 8 College Football Blue Bloods

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

No they don't.

View attachment 119945

Sorry, you don't have a win in 2010.

 

[Across The Field]

Sorry, you don't have a win in 2010.

Yeah we do. I watched it.

Michigan vs. Ohio State - Game Recap - November 27, 2010 - ESPN

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

Yeah we do. I watched it.

Michigan vs. Ohio State - Game Recap - November 27, 2010 - ESPN

Unfortunately for your stats, it was later discovered that Ohio State paid players to be on their roster, players that were later used to win games. Since Michigan has a lot more money than Ohio State, one can only assume that if Michigan was allowed to pay active players on their roster, we would have won.

 

[Across The Field]

Unfortunately for your stats, it was later discovered that Ohio State paid players to be on their roster, players that were later used to win games. Since Michigan has a lot more money than Ohio State, one can only assume that if Michigan was allowed to pay active players on their roster, we would have won.

Show me the link to this discovery that Ohio State paid their players, please.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

Show me the link to this discovery that Ohio State paid their players, please.

Valuable jewelry doesn't buy itself.

 

[Wamu]

Show me the link to this discovery that Ohio State paid their players, please.

That won't happen. mNb09 talks alotta shit but rarely (if ever) backs up any of his ramblings.

 

[Across The Field]

Valuable jewelry doesn't buy itself.

So you're taking the Hammer approach of "I know I'm wrong so I'll just make stuff up".

The game happened, we won, you were wrong about michigan having the lead since 1976.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

So you're taking the Hammer approach of "I know I'm wrong so I'll just make stuff up".

The game happened, we won, you were wrong about michigan having the lead since 1976.

The NCAA disagrees.

 

[Across The Field]

The NCAA disagrees.

No they don't. Even if we do you a favor and omit that game, you were still wrong about them having the lead in the series since 1976 - at worst, OSU is tied with them at 19 wins apiece with 1 tie. Sorry, you're not winning this argument.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

No they don't. Even if we do you a favor and omit that game, you were still wrong about them having the lead in the series since 1976 - at worst, OSU is tied with them at 19 wins apiece with 1 tie. Sorry, you're not winning this argument.

Yup, we're tied.

 

[Across The Field]

From 1976, Michigan leads the series. We already discussed this.

Yup, we're tied.

Classic.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

Classic.

I miscounted, which certainly did hurt my argument significantly. But I'm digging my heals in with the tie.

 

[Across The Field]

I miscounted, which certainly did hurt my argument significantly. But I'm digging my heals in with the tie.

I don't care what you're doing. I saw us win the game in 2010, and you guys still claim a loss to us that year.

 

[B_dub]

Unfortunately for your stats, it was later discovered that Ohio State paid players to be on their roster, players that were later used to win games. Since Michigan has a lot more money than Ohio State, one can only assume that if Michigan was allowed to pay active players on their roster, we would have won.

By that logic: OU would be claiming the 2004 Title. And I've never seen any OU fan stoop to that level to try and claim that one.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

By that logic: OU would be claiming the 2004 Title. And I've never seen any OU fan stoop to that level to try and claim that one.

What do you mean? OU did win the 2004 national title.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

No they don't. Yet again you have been proven wrong. Since '76 the Rivalry stands @ 19-19-1. And that's taking into consideration Ohio State's vacated W from '10. More incorrect info from you, that's nothing new though.

Unlike you, I'm fine in admitting when I've said something incorrect. You like to say stupid things and then call other people stupid for not accepting false information.

 

[Across The Field]

Unlike you, I'm fine in admitting when I've said something incorrect. You like to say stupid things and then call other people stupid for not accepting false information.

You mean like how Ohio State paid it's players? That kind of false information?

 

[B_dub]

What do you mean? OU did win the 2004 national title.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

You mean like how Ohio State paid it's players? That kind of false information?

Who gave Ohio State the expensive jewelry?

 

[Wamu]

From 1976, Michigan leads the series. We already discussed this.

How many more times do you need to be proven wrong? Since '76 the Rivalry stands @ 19-19-1. And that's taking into consideration Ohio State's vacated W from '10.