DanBengalfan
Raving lunatic
Who? Me?
no, sorry, not you, try harder.
Who? Me?
Just go back and watch Wilson from last night. Multiple times when the pass rush was coming at him he either threw the ball at a receivers feet or he threw it over their head out of bounds. Wilson made a mistake once on the fumble thinking he could get away, but other than that he was very good at it.
To be exact, Wilson has faced pressure on 46.6% of his dropbacks, or the highest rate in the league, while Dalton has been pressured on only 26.1% of his, second least to PManning. If Wilson played for us behind our oline, we would be scoring like Denver.
I wouldn't go that far.
Wilson has a huge, huge weapon in his RB.
Bengals have zero running game compared to Seattle.
Gio is good, but his running is only so-so.
Your passing game really opens up off a good play-action fake, and a mobile QB that can buy WR's time.
Lynch is a stud for sure, but don't you think our running game would work better if our opponents feared we could get downfield easily?
I wouldn't go that far.
Wilson has a huge, huge weapon in his RB.
Bengals have zero running game compared to Seattle.
Gio is good, but his running is only so-so.
Your passing game really opens up off a good play-action fake, and a mobile QB that can buy WR's time.
BANNED FROM TWITTER!!!
THE ULTIMATE TROLL!!! [...] you're a certified stalker now.
Lol... looks like poor ol' Dan is trying to get some attention. I ignored your 1st weak ass comment for a reason. You're insignificant!
I will argue the opposite...don't you think we could open things up down field if teams feared our actual ground game (not Gio leaking out for passes)?
I will say, that eventually, the short passing game could lead to the same situation as a solid ground game: Safeties move closer to the LOS, putting 8 or more near the "box". This will open things up down field. Now, the question is: Will there be plays called to take advantage, and when they are called, can Andy execute them.