- Thread starter
- #3,061
i dont know if anyone has that much of an edge , those guys are bottom feeder type wrsSure, im just saying the former EB players have an edge. There will be a camp battle. No doubt
i dont know if anyone has that much of an edge , those guys are bottom feeder type wrsSure, im just saying the former EB players have an edge. There will be a camp battle. No doubt
i dont know if anyone has that much of an edge , those guys are bottom feeder type wrs
Huge is the wrong word , helpful is betterbut they have exp in St's. thats huge
Probably will not but I think they should. Remember he missed a FG in the tied Giants game. He also missed 4 XP on the season. We won in spite of him vs Chicago and GB. Competition is good.Yes, he had a bad Dallas game. No arguments but basically won the Eagles game on Monday night. He is not consistent. You think they had a 3rd kicker in TC?
I believe Allen will be given every opportunity to make the roster as KR/PR 6th WR. It's all up to him.Huge is the wrong word , helpful is better
This stat (heaviest) means nothing to me. Years ago many railed against our DL that was lighter and more athletic and many of those played many more years. Right guys in the right system can work.
Probably will not but I think they should. Remember he missed a FG in the tied Giants game. He also missed 4 XP on the season. We won in spite of him vs Chicago and GB. Competition is good.
thats the 99 yr lease thing i have been reading about
thats the 99 yr lease thing i have been reading about
I'd love it, but I don't see how they go back to Redskins. I understand the name change was a power play from the minority owners to get Dan to sell, but to GO BACK to Redskins would raise a bunch of eyebrows in Harris' direction.If Harris gets the team back to RFK and gets the Redskins name, uniforms, and helmets back, they should build a statue of him at the front door at RFK.
I am going to be taking a break shortly from the board, but I think the notion of going back to the Redskins is just not realistic.I'd love it, but I don't see how they go back to Redskins. I understand the name change was a power play from the minority owners to get Dan to sell, but to GO BACK to Redskins would raise a bunch of eyebrows in Harris' direction.
It also might cost us the RFK site. Now, me personally, they could play in Stafford for all I care if it meant Redskins and old uniforms, but I just don't see it.
Not trying to assign homework, but I'd love to hear from a board member the plan on how they would get that done. Not being sarcastic at all. I really want to know because I'd love to have my team back.
I agree, but I definitely think the old uniforms are in play minus the logo.I am going to be taking a break shortly from the board, but I think the notion of going back to the Redskins is just not realistic.
Snyder was roasted by the media...both news media and sports media. Why would Harris open the organization back up to this type of scrutiny? Would it be nice...sure...is it going to happen...I can honestly say that there is a zero % chance of going back to the Redskins with the old uniforms.
We live in a different world than we did 5 years ago and people forget that sponsors were leaving and sports websites/affiliates were beginning to pull Redskin merchandise. Any political support for a stadium would be eliminated. It might not be fair...but it is reality.
I am confused why some people haven't figured this out yet. It's like some people want to stay trapped in the past. There is no way that the minority partners would sign off on this...even if Harris wanted to do it. I also think the team itself would not support it...that being the players.
I actually love the new uniforms. They are clean and modern looking. The black alt uniforms are sick.I agree, but I definitely think the old uniforms are in play minus the logo.