Colley Matrix Rankings Week 6

[ericd7633]

1. Stanford
2. Florida State
3. Clemson
4. Alabama
5. Oklahoma
6. Georgia
7. Missouri
8. Ohio State
9. Miami
10. Oregon
11. Michigan
12. UCLA
13. Texas Tech
14. Baylor
15. LSU
16. Virgina Tech
17. Auburn
18. Northern Illinois
19. Fresno State
20. Louisville
21. South Carolina
22. Washington
23. Florida
24. Houston
25. Texas A&M

Other Notable Rankings:

26. Northwestern
30. Notre Dame
31. Nebraska
42. Oklahoma State
62. Wisconsin
78. Texas

 

[occupant]

I think Colley uses very little previous season data to arrive at his rankings, and doesn't entertain score fests against perceptibly weaker opponents.

 

[belcherboy]

Finally Michigan getting the respect they deserve!

 

[Uman5]

1. Stanford
2. Florida State
3. Clemson
4. Alabama
5. Oklahoma
6. Georgia
7. Missouri
8. Ohio State
9. Miami
10. Oregon


This guy must be crazy. 3 SEC, 3 ACC Can't be possible.

 

[Red_Alert]

1. Stanford
2. Florida State
3. Clemson
4. Alabama
5. Oklahoma
6. Georgia
7. Missouri
8. Ohio State
9. Miami
10. Oregon


This guy must be crazy. 3 SEC, 3 ACC Can't be possible.

It's a computer.

It had Notre Dame #1 in it's final poll last season "after" they'd lost to Alabama in the NC.

 

[bamabear82]

It's a computer.

It had Notre Dame #1 in it's final poll last season "after" they'd lost to Alabama in the NC.

I think it basically boiled down to Bama's loss was worse than ND's loss ranking wise. I could be completely wrong about that though. It's still silly either way.

 

[Red_Alert]

I think it basically boiled down to Bama's loss was worse than ND's loss ranking wise. I could be completely wrong about that though. It's still silly either way.

Head -to-Head should be the heaviest weight factor, then work your way down from there.

 

[occupant]

Coaching/gameplanning isn't a measurable statistic unless you're looking at W's and L's.

 

[4down20]

Head -to-Head should be the heaviest weight factor, then work your way down from there.

How would you propose to do that code wise?

 

[Red_Alert]

How would you propose to do that code wise?

You're right. I guess programing respective schedules and results in would be impossible to do.

 

[Uman5]

It's a computer.
It had Notre Dame #1 in it's final poll last season "after" they'd lost to Alabama in the NC.

Still may be smarter than the average Team SEC fan.

 

[4down20]

You're right. I guess programing respective schedules and results in would be impossible to do.

You go ahead and do that big boy, and then lets all laugh at your results because the transitive property is total shit.

Oh wait, here you go, it's already been done.

My Team Is Better Than Your Team - The Transitive Property of College Football

 

[ericd7633]

I think it basically boiled down to Bama's loss was worse than ND's loss ranking wise. I could be completely wrong about that though. It's still silly either way.

Both teams had one loss and ND played a tougher schedule. It's as simple as that. It's also why Florida was ahead of louisville after the bowls.

 

[osubuckeye89]

7. Missouri

lol

 

[4down20]

You go ahead and do that big boy, and then lets all laugh at your results because the transitive property is total shit.

Oh wait, here you go, it's already been done.

My Team Is Better Than Your Team - The Transitive Property of College Football

And btw, there is only 1 way I use head to head match ups in such a way, and that is after all the rankings are said and done. If the team below the team above them has beaten the team above them, then I will move that team ahead. A team can keep moving up spots so long as the team above them is someone they have beaten. If the teams have played twice in a year, then the latest game is the one it uses.

But if a team is ahead by 2 or more ranks, no movement.

 

[Red_Alert]

You go ahead and do that big boy, and then lets all laugh at your results because the transitive property is total shit.

Oh wait, here you go, it's already been done.

My Team Is Better Than Your Team - The Transitive Property of College Football

Head to Head is the #1 tie breaker in every conference when determining who will play in their respective conference title games.

Quit being an idiot.

 

[4down20]

Head to Head is the #1 tie breaker in every conference when determining who will play in their respective conference title games.

Quit being an idiot.

This isn't conference divisions where they have all played each other.

 

[Red_Alert]

This isn't conference divisions where they have all played each other.

Believe me. We all understand that Bamers defend ignoring Head-to-Head games for a chance at do-overs.

 

[4down20]

Believe me. We all understand that Bamers defend ignoring Head-to-Head games for a chance at do-overs.

Sorry, I couldn't hear you over this crystal ball.

 

[bamabear82]

Believe me. We all understand that Bamers defend ignoring Head-to-Head games for a chance at do-overs.

*Bammers