Of course nice substance. Moving on.
And yet I think they have the best shot of beating Bama out of the other playoff teams.
No it wasn't. They will be better in two years. Btw nice to have 1 pro championship in like 50 years lovable loser.Damn 43 seniors and you lost to the youngest team in the nation in a game where they didnt even play good. That sucks for scUM fans. This was the year, now y'all are fucked
It doesn't matter we didn't win the conference. Only way Michigan gets in is if almost every favorite next week loses.
Nowhere near the most talented team. Carr had like 4 or 5 teams that were more talented. A lot of these players were overrated and soft. Look at some of the RBs and OLinemen. Soft. QBs are garbage. More talented players are coming in, just like Meyer when he replaced Tressell and his overrated recruits.
You're right about that. I get your point, that just wasn't the first time I've seen someone say Colorado was 'killed' in the last 24 hours, and that's just not how I remember the game.
I'm saying a lot of those guys were still under performers this year. That O-line is soft except for 2/3 players. Kalis was a 5 star recruit and now is going to be a late round draft pick. He sucks and is soft. I will retract that statement if he is the next Jake Long or Joe Thomas.
“Experts” have been downplaying Washington’s schedule all year. But if Washington takes care of Colorado next week they will finish 12-1 in a power conference with a 4-1 record against ranked teams/teams over .500
Yet, the talk still revolves around the possibility of a 2 loss Wisconsin or Penn State team leap frogging Washington to take the #4 spot in the CFB playoff rankings.
This is unprecedented. A dominant 1 loss Pac-12 (or Pac-10) team has never finished outside of the top 4 in the CFB rankings or AP Top 25. Matter fact, in 2010 both Oregon and Stanford finished 12-1 and were ranked #3 and #4 despite the Pac-10 not having a single team ranked in the top 25 besides Oregon and Stanford.
Stanford didn't beat a single ranked team that year and Oregon's lone quality win was against Stanford.
So what's the difference with Washington?
Name brand and prestige. I guarantee you if USC had the exact same success with the exact same schedule, they'd be a lock for #2 or #3 without anyone questioning it.
Now let's look at resumes.
Washington has faced 4 teams over .500
Both Penn State and Wisconsin have faced 2 more quality teams (over .500) on their schedule, but Washington has performed better against those quality teams outscoring those teams by an average score of 33-18. Penn State’s average score against teams over .500 is 29-29 and Wisconsin’s average score is 19-17.
If anything, Michigan is the 2 loss team most deserving of playoff consideration. They’ve beaten 3 top 10 teams including both Penn State AND Wisconsin.
I think it's true but the wack alignment allowed for this. I really think there are only 3 legit Big 10 teams this year.
