- Thread starter
- #121
forty_three
Stance: Goofy
Was down in DC at the Smithsonian and just got back to the inlaws. Was already 3-1, so, ummmm... Good job guys?
Can you really call it that after such bad one?
I put a shotgun in my mouth, but I pulled it out without pulling the trigger!
Good choice!
Well, it is at least consistent with the standard of one playoff game being worth 5 reg season ones.
Sucks though, he will be back before the series is over. Irresponsible piece of garbage.
Goaltending is voodoo and no one knows how it works.
Oh, now intent is important?
The puck vanished.
It's right there, behind the water bottle.
Uhhh, I didn't see it.
IT'S RIGHT THERE
Should we call Toronto?
DUDE
I don't want to tell Sullivan it's a goal.
/probably
Good decision.
Can you really call it that after such bad one?
I put a shotgun in my mouth, but I pulled it out without pulling the trigger!
Good choice!
Well, it is at least consistent with the standard of one playoff game being worth 5 reg season ones.
Sucks though, he will be back before the series is over. Irresponsible piece of garbage.
I need @forty_three to 'Splain to me how Bob stumbling around is helping
Goaltending is voodoo and no one knows how it works.
Ridiculous. If that guy breaks his face when falling to the ice it's a 20-gamer minimum. NHL has to stop being dictated by the result of the play and use intent. Being away from the puck and especially the secondary hit made the intent perfectly clear. Should have been 3-4 minimum.
Oh, now intent is important?
lol - Refs wave off the Werenski goal, then notice the puck by the water bottle at the back of the net. Solid job, zebras.
The puck vanished.
It's right there, behind the water bottle.
Uhhh, I didn't see it.
IT'S RIGHT THERE
Should we call Toronto?
DUDE
I don't want to tell Sullivan it's a goal.
/probably