- Thread starter
- #1
PnkPanther
Well-Known Member
I'm surprised Nebraska isn't on worst, as they're continually pulling in top 25 classes, but, you know, not winning
The fine print says that this is an analysis based on a single season.
well obviously, but it paints my team in a good light, so I shared it
I love Coach O, always have, but I don’t think he would have been as successful in Los Angeles. His voice and personality fits LSU, not so much Southern CaliforniaRemember when USC didn’t hire Ed? What retards.
How on earth is the aggys on there? They have had some bad classes? They too got bit by the Texas RB 2016 class when they took WhaleyHow the hell is Michigan not in there with FSU, USC and Texas?
The Pig Aggies? Really?
I'm surprised Nebraska isn't on worst, as they're continually pulling in top 25 classes, but, you know, not winning
What’s ironic is, under Les LSU was infamous for underutilizing talent. Go figure.That's only for 2019. The article 247 did, last week. Showed a 4 year span. I think UO, made the Top 10??
But Bama and OSU ruled, with Clemson, LSU and OU following. If I remember right, OU and LSU, tied
Don’t you have to have the talent to qualify for underutilizing it?Ah-ha! Not on the list for worst, suck it USC.
Exactly. Did I miss the years the pig aggies had 3-4 top 10 recruiting classes in a row? I'm old and my memory sucks, but...Don’t you have to have the talent to qualify for underutilizing it?
LSU 4 year average through 2019: #7.25 classDon’t you have to have the talent to qualify for underutilizing it?
whoa whoa..20 years? You do know they did win 10 plus games 9 years in a row right? from 2001-2009 right? They also sent a lot of NFL picks throughout that stretch.. But I guess winning one MNC and losing in another makes it underachieving?Texas wins this contest by a Texas sized mile.
They have underachieved for 20+ years now..
Texas A&M should be on there Before Arkansas as well.
Neither program deserves a football program TBH.