dougplayer
D Back and ranger fans are GAF....
Let's all agree. Pedro is a poor man's verlander.
You fool... you failed to realize that was a list put together before the ‘16 season and sorted by a specific statistic.You fool.. you left out one of the best rightys to come down the pike in a long time. J. VERLANDER... wake up man!!
And you got neither.You just upset. You got porcello instead of verlander
"Why not have a debate on it?"Can We rename the thread Best Based on WAR?? In no way is WAR the best test for SP... especially when it overweighs longevity, and overweighs innings pitched...
Are you really telling me Mussina is better than Roy Halladay or Clayton Kershaw??
"Why not have a debate on it?"
It's merely a starting point. I also provided their Hall Rating rankings which weighs peak and longevity. So why don't you come up with your list?
"Why not have a debate on it?"
It's merely a starting point. I also provided their Hall Rating rankings which weighs peak and longevity. So why don't you come up with your list?
Okay so the closest these guys could be are:Just wondering... what do you consider better... A player in a 5 season span being a top 5 pitcher, with at least ONE season as the BEST pitcher, or a player in a 10 season span being a top 10 pitcher but never being a top 5 guy??
Can We rename the thread Best Based on WAR?? In no way is WAR the best test for SP... especially when it overweighs longevity, and overweighs innings pitched...
Are you really telling me Mussina is better than Roy Halladay or Clayton Kershaw??
Doug, you REALLY need to stop drinking the metro water in Detroit. Not sure if you have been following the news, but...WAR for pitchers. Pleseeeee.
1. Wins
Let's all agree. Pedro is a poor man's verlander.
The truth hurt?Did that sound clever in your head?
I think when pitchers threw 7 or 8 innings every start, a win was worth something, provided his team had the lead.WAR for pitchers. Pleseeeee.
1. Wins
2.ERA
3.WHIP
4. Ks
5.IP
Those are the best stats to look at for pitchers.