fastforward
Well-Known Member
It certainly does, but so does Passer Rating which ignores rushing and is heavily dependent on completion percentage. In the end it comes down to personal opinions.QBR sucks as a rating.
It certainly does, but so does Passer Rating which ignores rushing and is heavily dependent on completion percentage. In the end it comes down to personal opinions.QBR sucks as a rating.
Again, the thread is about the Bengals passing attack, which looks solid but I don't think it's anything special. Burrow is clearly the best part of the Bengals passing attack but to me he's not in the top 10% of NFL starting QBs, and top 20% would be borderline. He might not be top 30%. Nothing uncomfortable about that.So the QBR for the NFL is obviously based differently than PFF. PFF had Burrow as the #1 QBR in the NFL until Brady overtook him in week 18 because Burrow sat out and Brady had a great week. That made Burrow #2.
Plus, I was not bashing you. I was just verifying your point of view. If you are basing it off all the stuff you are referencing, you would be hard pressed to not include Burrow in the top 10, maybe even top 5 if you are basing it off this year, especially if you remove those couple areas the QB has little to no control over, blocking and sacks.
If you are going to take into account blocking and sacks, you are indeed making Joe Burrow a worse QB. Because you are taking into account stats that the QB has almost no control over in many situations. So if it makes you feel better to take that into account to diminish Joe Burrow, go right ahead. I don't want to upset your perception that makes you comfortable.
I'd suggest putting that $200 Vcash on a long-shot. It should reset back to $200 if you lose.The line is -7 Chiefs for the Bengals vs Chiefs title game lmfao! Just smash that to death and make some money.
I meant real money lol. But you got a deal.I'd suggest putting that $200 Vcash on a long-shot. It should reset back to $200 if you lose.
Fair enough about the passing attack, I can live with your reasoning. We will agree to disagree on Burrow.Again, the thread is about the Bengals passing attack, which looks solid but I don't think it's anything special. Burrow is clearly the best part of the Bengals passing attack but to me he's not in the top 10% of NFL starting QBs, and top 20% would be borderline. He might not be top 30%. Nothing uncomfortable about that.