jontaejones
Well-Known Member
Draft picks!!!
The Nets actually GOT draft picks? Did I read that right?
The Nets actually GOT draft picks? Did I read that right?
In the regular season, yes. If the Nets are playing Drummond 25 minutes against the Bucks or Sixers in the playofs, he is going to get absolutely roasted.
Just curious but why do you think the Sixers didn't improve their chances at winning a title? They have a guy right now that is the favorite to be the MVP. They have decent depth, outside the 5, and their starting 5 should be one of the best in the NBA this season.
If you want to say that they aren't a favorite that's fine. Arguing that trading Seth Curry and Drummond for Harden doesn't improve their title chances this year seems pretty silly.
Because he might be the most ball dominant player in the entire league.
Yeah, he gets a lot of assists because he is a good passer and he always has the ball.
But do you really want the offense running through Harden instead of Embiid?
Because Harden has never been asked to play any other way.
A year from now, I think you Philly fans may be looking at this deal like the Lakers are looking at Russ.
They did for sure.
They went from just barely above zero to a legitimate dark horse puncher’s chance.
It is just that Brooklyn went from a team in turmoil to a potential juggernaut. They added fit and depth.
They did for sure.
They went from just barely above zero to a legitimate dark horse puncher’s chance.
It is just that Brooklyn went from a team in turmoil to a potential juggernaut. They added fit and depth.
They did for sure.
They went from just barely above zero to a legitimate dark horse puncher’s chance.
It is just that Brooklyn went from a team in turmoil to a potential juggernaut. They added fit and depth.
Explain to me how this doesn't help the Sixers' chances when Simmons wasn't even on the court.
Well, I've made it pretty clear, but I will try to explain differently.
With KD, Harden and Kyrie, a Nets team that is full and healthy, is the favorite to not just come out of the East, but win the title. They had 2 somewhat glaring weaknesses that teams could hope to exploit...their lack of defense and their best big being Blake Griffin.
The Sixers just handed over an elite level defender who also happens to have elite ballhandling and passing skills and is a very good finisher at the rim in Simmons. They also gave them Drummond, who isn't great, but is an upgrade over Griffin (especially defensively) and Curry who is a career 43.7% shooter from 3.
While Harden is a great scorer, he is ball dominant and doesn't play defense.
So again, it's not about the Sixers not improving, it's that in doing so, they improved a team that was already better than them and that they are likely to have to go through to win the East, by more than they improve themselves and maybe significantly more.
Just curious but why do you think the Sixers didn't improve their chances at winning a title?
I was saying all this earlier today.Are you and igloo on the wacky tobbacky today? Not sure how many more times I have to explain it, but check out post #3828. If that post doesn't help...![]()
Yea, but they didn't have Simmons is the thing.
So you have to compare the 2021-2022 team versus the team they have now with Harden.
It doesn't matter whether or not they had Simmons. What the Sixers gave the Nets improves the Nets by more than what the addition of Harden improves the Sixers.
I was saying all this earlier today.
Agree on Kings not Westbrook. He’s cookedImo, the Sixers would have been better off trading with the Lakers for Westbrook because it probably wouldn't have cost them Curry and I'm only about half kidding.
They should have gone back and revisited the Sacramento deal, that would have improved the Sixers without improving the Nets.
Harris for Russ would’ve been somethingImo, the Sixers would have been better off trading with the Lakers for Westbrook because it probably wouldn't have cost them Curry and I'm only about half kidding.
They should have gone back and revisited the Sacramento deal, that would have improved the Sixers without improving the Nets.
It doesn't matter whether or not they had Simmons. What the Sixers gave the Nets improves the Nets by more than what the addition of Harden improves the Sixers.
Imo, the Sixers would have been better off trading with the Lakers for Westbrook because it probably wouldn't have cost them Curry and I'm only about half kidding.